# What stood on this ground? The heritage register’s answer within 1000m of -43.40292, 172.69837, nothing scheduled in the register here. A register listing is a lead to follow, not by itself a claim. Distances are to each place’s recorded pin, not its boundary. The point falls inside [Brooklands](https://www.chch.live/brooklands) and in the [Coastal ward](https://www.chch.live/wards/coastal), Celeste Donovan's seat, measured against the drawn boundaries, not the side its address is described as. The whole roll is at [/wards](https://www.chch.live/wards). The nearest break GeoNet recorded sits 2.1km from this point, a M3.4 on 18 September 2010, 5 km deep, labelled "10 km north of Christchurch" ([its record at GeoNet](https://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/3373805)). none within a kilometre, 8 within five, the biggest inside five kilometres a M4.2 on 2 January 2012, 7 km deep. An epicentre is where the instruments placed the break, not where the shaking was felt; the whole catalogue is at [sequence](https://www.chch.live/sequence) and the story in plain language is [the earthquakes explainer](https://www.chch.live/how-nz-works/canterbury-earthquakes). The Crown’s 2011 classification drew this point inside the residential red zone, "land repair would be prolonged and uneconomic". A classification is the record of a decision, not a finding about this address today, the whole boundary is at [redzone](https://www.chch.live/redzone). The district plan files this ground as **Specific Purpose (Flat Land Recovery)** (SPLR), the specific purpose family. A zone is a permission, not a description, the whole district’s zoning is at [zones](https://www.chch.live/zones). The 2011 grading never reached this point, the categories ran over the flat residential land. The grades are at [technical-categories](https://www.chch.live/technical-categories). The nearest mapped fault trace sits 17.8km from this point, part of the Ashley Fault Zone. A drawn trace is the record of where the ground broke or deformed, not a prediction for this address, the mapped faults are at [faults](https://www.chch.live/faults). No recorded dump under this point, the council’s landfill layer keeps the old tips on the books and this isn’t one. The ones that are, from 1880 on: [landfills](https://www.chch.live/landfills). No recorded flood patch reaches this point, the layer keeps the water it saw and never drew it here. The ground it did draw: [floods](https://www.chch.live/floods). The plan’s flood map puts this point inside a *high flood hazard* area, the ground it expects to take water deep or fast. It sits inside the *Lower Styx River* flood-management area, the catchment’s own watch. A mapped ponding spot marks this ground too. The waiting water: [flood-hazard](https://www.chch.live/flood-hazard). The rebuild photographed this ground, **25** SCIRT frames within a few hundred metres, 2013–2014, stormwater work mostly. The nearest is about 148 m away, a drainage shot, [the frame itself](https://gis.ccc.govt.nz/image/SCIRT/Photos/Manhole_Photos/SWIN3432_3432l_20121018110931.jpg). A work log filed as the dig went on, not a survey of what stands today. The whole record: [rebuild](https://www.chch.live/rebuild). The plaque register puts a dedication about **0 m** from this point, it reads “THIS PROJECT WAS INITIATED BY THE SHIRLEY PAPANUI COMMUNITY BOARD ON BEHALF OF LOCAL YOUNG PEOPLE. THIS FACILITY WAS OFFICIALLY OPENED BY THE SHIRLEY PAPANUI COMMUNITY BOARD ON 3RD MARCH 2001.”, standing on Brooklands Domain, commissioned 2008. 2 inscribed plaques stand within a short walk. The whole roll: [plaques](https://www.chch.live/plaques). The rules on this ground, the dog rules name this ground, Brooklands Red Zone (prohibited/under effective control); Brooklands Red Zone (prohibited/under effective control); Brooklands Red Zone (prohibited/under effective control); inside the takiwā of Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga. The bylaw is the instrument, this is the register’s drawing of it, thinned to ~4 m. The whole rulebook: [rules](https://www.chch.live/rules). The plan’s mapped inundation extent covers this point, the sea could reach here in a tsunami, on NIWA’s modelling for Environment Canterbury (ECAN Report R12/38 2012; ECAN Report R14/78 2014). A modelled reach, not a prediction, the plan’s line, not the evacuation map. The whole extent: [tsunami](https://www.chch.live/tsunami). ## The marae and the old grounds The nearest marae on the roll is [Tuahiwi Marae](https://www.chch.live/marae/tuahiwi), wharenui Maahunui II, 9.0km from this point (Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri Rūnanga, the mana whenua of Christchurch). The nearest named ground the plan schedules is **Kaiapohia, Kaiapoi Pā**, north of the Waimakariri, near Waikuku, 3.4km away, the great fortified capital of Ngāi Tahu, Tūrākautahi's pā, sacked by Te Rauparaha in 1832 after a siege of months; its fall is why the rūnanga moved to Tuahiwi. The whole roll: [maraes](https://www.chch.live/maraes), a record of what the file says, not a claim on this point. No hazardous-activities listing reaches this point, the register keeps the parcels where contaminating work ran, and this isn’t one. The ones that are: [hazards](https://www.chch.live/hazards). No fill parcel reaches this point, the files keep the ground that was made, and this isn’t filed as made. The parcels that are: [fill](https://www.chch.live/fill). The rockfall survey’s nearest pin sits 16.9km from this point, a rock that came down in the shakes. A pin is where the survey saw the rock, not a promise about the slope, the survey: [boulders](https://www.chch.live/boulders). ## What the model says The 2019 liquefaction vulnerability study draws this ground as **High Liquefaction Vulnerability**, Dune related deposits which are usually well characterised by observed performance, CPT investigations and simplified liquefaction analyses. A district-scale screening read, not a finding about an address, the study itself says site-specific analysis confirms a parcel. The whole study: [vulnerability](https://www.chch.live/vulnerability). ## The armour The nearest engineered defence sits 18.0km away, a mesh drape installed 2011. Nearly all are the emergency works the quake years left standing; the file’s condition rating is its own word, not a fresh inspection. The register: [defences](https://www.chch.live/defences). ## The canopy The register counts **3** notable trees within half a kilometre of this point, 3 carrying a protection, the nearest is **Wellingtonia** (*giganteum*), 13 m tall, a crown 11 m across, carrying a subdivision protection, 287m away. A tree record is the register’s word on what stands, not a fresh survey. The canopy: [trees](https://www.chch.live/trees). No scheduled place sits within 1000m of this point. That is a statement about the register, not the ground, unscheduled does not mean unstoried, only that no listing has been made for it. ## How this answer is made The register this asks is the district-plan heritage schedule and the Heritage New Zealand list, scheduled places, not everything that stood here. If the record has this ground wrong, the corrections door is open: https://www.chch.live/corrections --- HTML: https://www.chch.live/before?lat=-43.40292&lon=172.69837&radius=1000 Map: https://www.chch.live/map?mode=places#-43.40292,172.69837,18 Data: https://api.chch.live/before?lat=-43.40292&lon=172.69837&radius=1000