# What stood on this ground? The heritage register’s answer within 250m of -43.52327, 172.63243, 5 places on record, nearest first. A register listing is a lead to follow, not by itself a claim. Distances are to each place’s recorded pin, not its boundary. The point falls inside [Christchurch Central](https://www.chch.live/christchurch-central-city) and in the [Central ward](https://www.chch.live/wards/central), Jake McLellan's seat, measured against the drawn boundaries, not the side its address is described as. The whole roll is at [/wards](https://www.chch.live/wards). The nearest break GeoNet recorded sits 1.1km from this point, a M3.8 on 25 September 2010, 5 km deep, labelled "Within 5 km of Christchurch" ([its record at GeoNet](https://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/3378127)). none within a kilometre, 87 within five, the biggest inside five kilometres a M4.7 on 26 December 2010, 5 km deep. An epicentre is where the instruments placed the break, not where the shaking was felt; the whole catalogue is at [sequence](https://www.chch.live/sequence) and the story in plain language is [the earthquakes explainer](https://www.chch.live/how-nz-works/canterbury-earthquakes). The Crown’s 2011 classification left this point outside the residential red zone. The whole boundary is at [redzone](https://www.chch.live/redzone). The district plan files this ground as **Transport** (T), the transport family. A zone is a permission, not a description, the whole district’s zoning is at [zones](https://www.chch.live/zones). The 2011 grading never reached this point, the categories ran over the flat residential land. The grades are at [technical-categories](https://www.chch.live/technical-categories). The nearest mapped fault trace sits 21.5km from this point, part of the Greendale Fault. A drawn trace is the record of where the ground broke or deformed, not a prediction for this address, the mapped faults are at [faults](https://www.chch.live/faults). No recorded dump under this point, the council’s landfill layer keeps the old tips on the books and this isn’t one. The ones that are, from 1880 on: [landfills](https://www.chch.live/landfills). No recorded flood patch reaches this point, the layer keeps the water it saw and never drew it here. The ground it did draw: [floods](https://www.chch.live/floods). No air-noise contour covers this point The ground is zoned *Category 3, Lower Noise Level Area*, the central city’s graded night. The quiet lines: [noise](https://www.chch.live/noise). The central-city walking catchment reaches this far, the ten-minute city the plan draws. The allowed shape: [density](https://www.chch.live/density). The rebuild photographed this ground, **910** SCIRT frames within a few hundred metres, 2011–2015, stormwater work mostly. The nearest is about 27 m away, an access shot from 2011-12-15, [the frame itself](https://gis.ccc.govt.nz/image/SCIRT/Photos/Manhole_Photos/CivilSolutionNZWWAccessSSMH1318920111216 122734.jpg). A work log filed as the dig went on, not a survey of what stands today. The whole record: [rebuild](https://www.chch.live/rebuild). The cycleway layer files a **cycle lane** about **185 m** from this point. Within a short walk the layer files 2.7 km of network. The books' record, not today’s cones, the whole network: [cycleways](https://www.chch.live/cycleways). The plaque register puts a dedication about **122 m** from this point, it reads “ALDRED PARK / IN 1993 A SUGGESTION WAS PUT TO THE CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL BY THE VICTORIA NEIGHBOURHOOD GROUP, TO ESTABLISH A RESERVE ON THIS SITE. / SUBSEQUENTLY IT WAS PURCHASED, CLEARED AND LANDSCAPED. / IT HAS BEEN NAMED FOR THE REVEREND ALDRED WHO OWNED LARGE TRACTS OF THE LAND IN THIS AREA DURING THE CITY'S EARLY SETTLEMENT. / THE NEIGHBOURHOOD SURROUNDING THIS PARK IS ONE OF THE OLDEST IN THE CITY. THE SOCIAL CLASS STRUCTURE OF 100 YEARS AGO IS STILL EVIDENT IN THE STYLES OF HOUSING IN THE AREA, FROM THE SMALLEST OF WORKERS COTTAGES TO LARGE VILLAS AND GRANDER HOMES. / EXAMPLES OF SOME OF THESE CAN BE SEEN ON illegible, DURHAM, PEACOCK AND MONTREAL STREETS, ALSO illegible AND GRACEFIELD AVENUES. / NOTABLE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED HERE INCLUDE JAMES K BAXTER (WRITER & POET) AND FANNY BUSS (ARTIST). / IN MEMORY OF / GEORGE THORN, JOHN HUGGINS, FRANK WARE & FRASER BURRIDGE, / WHO HELPED MAKE THIS A NEIGHBOURHOOD.”, standing on Aldred Reserve, commissioned 2004. 8 inscribed plaques stand within a short walk, across 3 named grounds. The whole roll: [plaques](https://www.chch.live/plaques). The rules on this ground, no alcohol here (Central City, Central City), in force around the clock; the dog rules name this ground, Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed); freedom camping is managed here, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area; inside the takiwā of Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga. The bylaw is the instrument, this is the register’s drawing of it, thinned to ~4 m. The whole rulebook: [rules](https://www.chch.live/rules). ## The marae and the old grounds The nearest marae on the roll is [Rehua Marae](https://www.chch.live/marae/rehua), wharenui Te Whatu Manawa Māoritanga o Rehua, 700m from this point (the city's urban Māori community, under the korowai of mana whenua Ngāi Tūāhuriri). The nearest named ground the plan schedules is **Puāri Pā**, Victoria Square and north along the river, 776m away, the Waitaha settlement on the Ōtākaro bank, the oldest village the city centre covers, and later the market where Ngāi Tūāhuriri sold produce. The whole roll: [maraes](https://www.chch.live/maraes), a record of what the file says, not a claim on this point. No hazardous-activities listing reaches this point, the register keeps the parcels where contaminating work ran, and this isn’t one. The ones that are: [hazards](https://www.chch.live/hazards). No fill parcel reaches this point, the files keep the ground that was made, and this isn’t filed as made. The parcels that are: [fill](https://www.chch.live/fill). The rockfall survey’s nearest pin sits 4.6km from this point, a rock that came down in the shakes. A pin is where the survey saw the rock, not a promise about the slope, the survey: [boulders](https://www.chch.live/boulders). ## What the model says The 2019 liquefaction vulnerability study draws this ground as **Medium Liquefaction Vulnerability**, River plain and channel deposits, observed performance variable and uncertainty in liquefaction performance due to effects of layered silty soil profiles. A district-scale screening read, not a finding about an address, the study itself says site-specific analysis confirms a parcel. The whole study: [vulnerability](https://www.chch.live/vulnerability). ## The armour The nearest engineered defence sits 5.7km away, a rock cable installed 2011. Nearly all are the emergency works the quake years left standing; the file’s condition rating is its own word, not a fresh inspection. The register: [defences](https://www.chch.live/defences). ## The canopy The register counts **121** notable trees within half a kilometre of this point, **10** veterans, 111 carrying a protection, the nearest is **Ash** (*excelsior*), 3 m tall, carrying a resource consent protection, on private land, 86m away. A tree record is the register’s word on what stands, not a fresh survey. The canopy: [trees](https://www.chch.live/trees). ## What the record says ### [Dwelling and Setting, 18 Beveridge Street](https://www.chch.live/place/13) 86m from your point 20 unread leads ### [Dwelling and Setting, 402 Montreal Street](https://www.chch.live/place/155) 138m from your point 20 unread leads ## On the register nearby - [Dwelling and Setting](https://www.chch.live/place/13), 86m · 18 Beveridge Street - [Dwelling and Setting](https://www.chch.live/place/155), 138m · 402 Montreal Street - [Dwelling and Setting](https://www.chch.live/place/156), 142m · 404 Montreal Street - [Dwelling and Setting](https://www.chch.live/place/157), 145m · 406 Montreal Street - [Dwelling and Setting](https://www.chch.live/place/158), 147m · 2/408 Montreal Street ## How this answer is made The register this asks is the district-plan heritage schedule and the Heritage New Zealand list, scheduled places, not everything that stood here. If the record has this ground wrong, the corrections door is open: https://www.chch.live/corrections --- HTML: https://www.chch.live/before?lat=-43.523273467375574&lon=172.63243103040176&radius=250 Map: https://www.chch.live/map?mode=places#-43.523273467375574,172.63243103040176,18 Data: https://api.chch.live/before?lat=-43.523273467375574&lon=172.63243103040176&radius=250