# What stood on this ground? The heritage register’s answer within 250m of -43.58456, 172.77469, 5 places on record, nearest first. A register listing is a lead to follow, not by itself a claim. Distances are to each place’s recorded pin, not its boundary. The point falls inside [Te Onepoto Taylors Mistake](https://www.chch.live/te-onepoto-taylors-mistake) and in the [Heathcote ward](https://www.chch.live/wards/heathcote), Nathaniel Herz Jardine's seat, measured against the drawn boundaries, not the side its address is described as. The whole roll is at [/wards](https://www.chch.live/wards). The nearest break GeoNet recorded sits 202m from this point, a M3.3 on 15 June 2011, 8 km deep, labelled "10 km south-east of Christchurch" ([its record at GeoNet](https://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/3529690)). 17 magnitude-3+ epicentres sit within a kilometre, the biggest inside five kilometres a M6.0 on 13 June 2011, 7 km deep. An epicentre is where the instruments placed the break, not where the shaking was felt; the whole catalogue is at [sequence](https://www.chch.live/sequence) and the story in plain language is [the earthquakes explainer](https://www.chch.live/how-nz-works/canterbury-earthquakes). The Crown’s 2011 classification left this point outside the residential red zone. The whole boundary is at [redzone](https://www.chch.live/redzone). The district plan files this ground as **Open Space Natural** (ON), the open space family. A zone is a permission, not a description, the whole district’s zoning is at [zones](https://www.chch.live/zones). The 2011 grading never reached this point, the categories ran over the flat residential land. The grades are at [technical-categories](https://www.chch.live/technical-categories). The nearest mapped fault trace sits 32.2km from this point, part of the Greendale Fault. A drawn trace is the record of where the ground broke or deformed, not a prediction for this address, the mapped faults are at [faults](https://www.chch.live/faults). No recorded dump under this point, the council’s landfill layer keeps the old tips on the books and this isn’t one. The ones that are, from 1880 on: [landfills](https://www.chch.live/landfills). No recorded flood patch reaches this point, the layer keeps the water it saw and never drew it here. The ground it did draw: [floods](https://www.chch.live/floods). The bach settlement Bach settlement No. 47 sits about 100 m away, the Peninsula’s kept-small holiday scale. The allowed shape: [density](https://www.chch.live/density). The rebuild photographed this ground, **32** SCIRT frames within a few hundred metres, stormwater work mostly. The nearest is about 232 m away from 2012-07-15, [the frame itself](https://gis.ccc.govt.nz/image/SCIRT/Photos/Port_hill_photos/Photos/QSxSBBp2TCKMx7_tjsxjLw.jpg). A work log filed as the dig went on, not a survey of what stands today. The whole record: [rebuild](https://www.chch.live/rebuild). The plaque register puts a dedication about **197 m** from this point, it reads “In Memory of our Wonderful Parents/ IAN & SADIE/ SCOTT/ 1928 - 1993 1928 - 2006/ Who always believed in giving it a go”, standing on Taylors Mistake Beach, commissioned 2007. 2 inscribed plaques stand within a short walk. The whole roll: [plaques](https://www.chch.live/plaques). The rules on this ground, inside the takiwā of Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga. The bylaw is the instrument, this is the register’s drawing of it, thinned to ~4 m. The whole rulebook: [rules](https://www.chch.live/rules). The plan’s mapped inundation extent covers this point, the sea could reach here in a tsunami, on NIWA’s modelling for Environment Canterbury (ECAN Report R12/38 2012; ECAN Report R14/78 2014). A modelled reach, not a prediction, the plan’s line, not the evacuation map. The whole extent: [tsunami](https://www.chch.live/tsunami). This point sits inside a scheduled area of significance to Ngāi Tahu, *Raekura ki Matuku Takotako* (Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna). The plan formally recognises this ground in the mana whenua cultural landscape, earthworks and works on the water carry extra care here. The whole schedule: [cultural](https://www.chch.live/cultural). ## The marae and the old grounds The nearest marae on the roll is [Rāpaki Marae](https://www.chch.live/marae/rapaki), wharenui Wheke, 7.9km from this point (Te Hapū o Ngāti Wheke, papatipu rūnanga of Ngāi Tahu). The nearest named ground the plan schedules is **Ōtautahi, Tautahi's kāinga**, the Avon Loop, near Oxford Terrace and Barbadoes Street, 12.6km away, the seasonal camp of Tautahi, the chief the city is named for and son of Huikai of Koukourārata, on the Avon Loop. The whole roll: [maraes](https://www.chch.live/maraes), a record of what the file says, not a claim on this point. This ground sits inside the plan’s landscape schedules, *significant* ground in the plan’s grading, *NCCE1.0 - Natural Character in the Coastal Environment*. What happens here answers to the view, the skyline, the cliffs, the shape of the place. It also sits inside the coastal environment, the plan’s coastal rules reach this far. The kept view: [landscape](https://www.chch.live/landscape). No hazardous-activities listing reaches this point, the register keeps the parcels where contaminating work ran, and this isn’t one. The ones that are: [hazards](https://www.chch.live/hazards). No fill parcel reaches this point, the files keep the ground that was made, and this isn’t filed as made. The parcels that are: [fill](https://www.chch.live/fill). The rockfall survey’s nearest pin sits 110m from this point, a hanging rock that wobbles easy; 56 more pins within half a kilometre, 8 fallen, 14 wobble easy. A pin is where the survey saw the rock, not a promise about the slope, the survey: [boulders](https://www.chch.live/boulders). ## The armour The nearest engineered defence sits 895m away, a rock cable installed 2011. Nearly all are the emergency works the quake years left standing; the file’s condition rating is its own word, not a fresh inspection. The register: [defences](https://www.chch.live/defences). ## The canopy The nearest notable tree on the register is **Norfolk island pine** (*heterophylla*), 7 m tall, a crown 6 m across, carrying a subdivision protection, on private land, 828m away. A tree record is the register’s word on what stands, not a fresh survey. The canopy: [trees](https://www.chch.live/trees). ## What the record says ### [Taylors Mistake Bach 6](https://www.chch.live/place/492) 101m from your point 37 unread leads ### [Taylors Mistake Bach 46](https://www.chch.live/place/510) 114m from your point 25 unread leads ## On the register nearby - [Taylors Mistake Bach 6](https://www.chch.live/place/492), 101m · 46 Taylors Mistake Bay - [Taylors Mistake Bach 46](https://www.chch.live/place/510), 114m · 46 Taylors Mistake Bay - [Taylors Mistake Bach 45](https://www.chch.live/place/511), 125m · 45 Taylors Mistake Bay - [Taylors Mistake Bach 44](https://www.chch.live/place/512), 138m · 44 Taylors Mistake Bay - [Taylors Mistake Bach 43](https://www.chch.live/place/513), 147m · 43 Taylors Mistake Bay ## How this answer is made The register this asks is the district-plan heritage schedule and the Heritage New Zealand list, scheduled places, not everything that stood here. If the record has this ground wrong, the corrections door is open: https://www.chch.live/corrections --- HTML: https://www.chch.live/before?lat=-43.584560416634545&lon=172.77469050104463&radius=250 Map: https://www.chch.live/map?mode=places#-43.584560416634545,172.77469050104463,18 Data: https://api.chch.live/before?lat=-43.584560416634545&lon=172.77469050104463&radius=250