# Hornby South vs Wigram, the record side by side

| | [Hornby South](https://www.chch.live/hornby-south) | [Wigram](https://www.chch.live/wigram) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | — | 11,410 (2023) |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 4,554 (indicative) | **4,794 (indicative)** |
| Census households | **1,740** | 1,593 |
| Under 15 (Census) | **18%** | 17% |
| 65+ (Census) | 15% | **17%** |
| Area | 3.49 km² | **5.85 km²** |
| People per km² | — | 1,950 |
| Reports filed | 513 | **4,595** |
| Rank on the roll | 87th of 108 | **34th of 108** |
| Reports per km² | 147 | **785** |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | **2023-05-08 (19 reports)** | 2022-08-14 (18 reports) |
| Crashes on record | 67 (6 fatal · 20 serious) | **111 (3 fatal · 26 serious)** |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 2 (biggest M3.8) | — |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | TC1 (5.0% of the outline) |
| Flooded on record | — | 4.6% (1 event) |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | — | — |
| The wild ledger | — | — |
| The kept view | — | 4% of the outline |
| The waiting water | — | — |
| The quiet lines | 83% of the outline, bird-strike buffer | **all of the outline, bird-strike buffer** |
| The drawn water | — | 38 reaches (Broken Run Reserve Drain, Broken Run Reserve Drain Branch), 3% setback strips |
| The allowed shape | — | 2% under density overlays, Medium Density |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 188 frames filed (2010–2013) | **1,386 frames filed (2011–2015)** |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline, Little River Link | **0.0 km inside the outline, Little River Link** |
| The remembered names | — | 4 plaques, Bennington 1 Drainage Reserve, Marama Park |
| The rules on the ground | 1 drawn rule, Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | **4 drawn rules, Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga** |
| On the hazard register | **30 parcels (12 current)** | 23 parcels (14 current) |
| Made ground on file | 59 parcels (7 unvouched) | 469 parcels (35 unvouched) |
| Surveyed rocks | — | — |
| Cleanups on file | 4 parcels (none verified) | 10 parcels (2 verified) |
| The model’s verdict | unlikely (57% of the outline) | low (51% of the outline) |
| Engineered defences | — | — |
| The canopy | 281 trees (no veterans, 30 remembered felled) | **4,217 trees (1 veteran, 884 remembered felled)** |
| The plan’s word | Industrial Heavy (57% of the outline) | Residential New Neighbourhood (25% of the outline, 39% residential) |
| The plan’s reservations | 4% of the outline (3 designations, movement) | **10% of the outline (3 designations, civic, movement)** |
| The plan’s exceptions | — | — |
| The listed city | — | 6 scheduled items (5 highly significant) |
| The usual complaints | Roading/Streets (86), Graffiti (59), Water Leak (35) | Roading/Streets (770), Parks (482), Graffiti (349) |
| Schools | 0 | **1** |
| Parks | 3 | **29** |
| Facilities | 0 | **1** |
| Tracks | 2 | **5** |
| Bus stops | — | 22 |
| Bus routes through | — | 4 |
| Heritage places | 0 | **7** |

Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue.

## Questions, answered briefly

**What is the difference between Hornby South and Wigram?**

Hornby South covers 3.49 km², Wigram 5.85 km²; the record holds 513 reports for Hornby South and 4,595 for Wigram.

**Which has more heritage places, Hornby South or Wigram?**

Wigram, 7 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.

**Where do these numbers come from?**

The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.

HTML: https://www.chch.live/compare?a=hornby-south&b=wigram
Data: https://api.chch.live/suburb?slug=hornby-south · https://api.chch.live/suburb?slug=wigram