Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Avondale | North New Brighton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,600 2023 | 4,220 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 2,466 indicative | 4,107 indicative |
| Census households | 927 | 1,650 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 19% | 20% |
| 65+ (Census) | 14% | 15% |
| Area | 2.15 km² | 2 km² |
| People per km² | 1,209 | 2,110 |
| Reports filed | 3,569 | 4,453 |
| Rank on the roll | 41st of 108 | 36th of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 1,660 | 2,227 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2016-04-27 33 reports | 2023-03-24 25 reports |
| Crashes on record | 117 1 fatal · 28 serious | 54 0 fatal · 17 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 4 biggest M3.7 | 5 biggest M3.9 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | 27.4% 59 ha | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | TC3 220.2% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 39.6% 1 event | — |
| The sea’s reach | 9% of the outline | 17% of the outline |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | 8% of the outline | 5% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | 8% of the outline | 4% of the outline |
| The kept view | 8% of the outline | 5% of the outline |
| The waiting water | 11% high-hazard · 84% managed | 2% high-hazard · 15% managed |
| The quiet lines | – | – |
| The drawn water | 23 reaches (Avon River, Wainoni Drain) · 14% setback strips · held edge | 4 reaches (Preece Drain, Kate Sheppard Stream) · 0% setback strips · held edge |
| The allowed shape | 1% under density overlays · Suburban | – |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 2,086 frames filed · 2011–2017 | 1,835 frames filed · 2011–2016 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · Te Ara Ōtākaro Avon River Trail | 0.0 km inside the outline |
| The remembered names | 2 plaques · Avon Riverbank True Right, Avon Corridor 10 Rrz Land | 4 plaques · Queen Elizabeth Ii Park, Broad Park |
| The rules on the ground | 6 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 8 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 7 parcels 2 current | 3 parcels none current |
| Made ground on file | 132 parcels 4 unvouched | 92 parcels 1 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 2 parcels none verified | 1 parcel none verified |
| The model’s verdict | high 94% of the outline · 9 free-face flags | high 37% of the outline |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 855 trees 7 veterans · 414 remembered felled | 1,350 trees no veterans · 743 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Specific Purpose (Otakaro Avon River Corridor) 38% of the outline · 30% residential | Residential Suburban 53% of the outline · 56% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 4% of the outline 4 designations · learning, movement | 8% of the outline 2 designations · learning |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | – |
| The listed city | – | 1 scheduled item none top-graded |
| The usual complaints | Graffiti 940 · Rubbish/Recycling 839 · Roading/Streets 228 | Graffiti 1,687 · Dumped Rubbish 314 · Roading/Streets 308 |
| Schools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks | 6 | 4 |
| Facilities | 0 | 0 |
| Tracks | 10 | 2 |
| Bus stops | 13 | 26 |
| Bus routes through | 1 | 3 |
| Heritage places | 0 | 1 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Avondale's page · North New Brighton's page
Questions, answered briefly
Avondale counts 2,600 people (2023) to North New Brighton's 4,220; Avondale covers 2.15 km², North New Brighton 2 km²; the record holds 3,569 reports for Avondale and 4,453 for North New Brighton.
North New Brighton, 1 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.