The ground that got cleaned
260 Christchurch parcels carry a cleanup on the file, about 85 hectares where the record says contamination was dealt with. Most of it the simple way: 211 parcels dug out and carted away. The rest are capped, sealed, treated, or managed in place, 25 under a long-term plan that keeps the contamination where it is.
The cleaned ground, drawn
Every parcel over the suburb outlines: grey is ground that went out, amber is capped or treated, red is managed in place. Hover for what the file says was done.
By what was done
The cleaned ground, by suburb
By the count of parcels carrying a cleanup on the file.
- Linwood, 37 parcels cleaned on file, 1 ha
- Christchurch Central City, 28 parcels cleaned on file, 3 ha · 8 verified
- Sydenham, 16 parcels cleaned on file, 0 ha
- PAPANUI, 15 parcels cleaned on file, 0 ha · 14 verified
- Woolston, 14 parcels cleaned on file, 3 ha
- Wigram, 10 parcels cleaned on file, 13 ha · 2 verified
- Mairehau, 7 parcels cleaned on file, 0 ha · 1 verified
- New Brighton, 7 parcels cleaned on file, 0 ha
- Saint Martins, 7 parcels cleaned on file, 1 ha · 7 verified
- Belfast, 6 parcels cleaned on file, 0 ha · 1 verified
Each remediated parcel files under the suburb its exterior’s middle sits in, the count of parcels, their hectares, and how many carry the verified mark. A cleanup on the file is the register’s word, not a clearance.
The latest on file
- 2024, soil removed (Subject To OSMP)verified · the ground →
- 2020, Contaminants managed on site with a Long Term Site Management Plan (Geotextile and fill cap)verified · the ground →
- 2019, asbestos removed (Accessible areas remediated.)verified · the ground →
- 2019, soil removed (further testing recommended)verified · the ground →
- 2019, asbestos removedverified · the ground →
- 2019, asbestos removedverified · the ground →
- 2019, soil removedverified · the ground →
- 2019, soil removedverified · the ground →
Questions, answered briefly
The cleanup file. Christchurch’s remediation layer holds 260 parcels, about 85 hectares, where the record says contamination was dealt with: 211 dug out and carted away, 25 managed in place under a long-term site plan, the rest capped, sealed or treated. It is the other half of the hazardous-activities register, the parcels that did something about it.
No, it means a cleanup is on the file. 57 records are marked verified; the rest are the register’s own description of work done, "soil removed", "contamination removed", "asbestos removed", without the file confirming it held. And "managed" records mean the contamination stays, contained, under a plan that outlives the cleanup.
Exactly that, the file’s own phrase is usually "soil removed" or "contamination removed": the ground was excavated and carted away, often to a lined landfill. It is the commonest cleanup on the register. The rarer ones are sealed, a cap of concrete or clean fill poured over the contaminated ground, and managed, where the contamination stays and the site carries a Long Term Site Management Plan.
A parcel can sit on both, the HAIL register records the work that can leave something behind; this register records the cleanup. The two pages cross-reference where the records link. A point’s own answer is at /before.
The record behind this
Christchurch City Council’s open land layers, the ContaminationRemediation layer of OpenData/LandCharacteristic. 57 records are marked verified; the rest are the file’s own word that the work happened. A remediation record is a cleanup on the file, not a clearance certificate, and "managed" means the contamination stays, held by a plan. The work that can leave something behind is /hazards; a point’s own record is at /before; the tips are /landfills.
This page as markdown: /remediated.md · the record as data: /remediated.json · /remediated.geojson · /suburb-remediated.json · on the live map: /map?layer=remediated.