The ground that moved
After each of the two big shakes the surveyors flew the city and drew every patch where the ground failed, 7,382 mapped patches, about 16,933 hectares of the city’s footprint, most of it under the eastern river suburbs. This is the record of what the ground did, not a model of what it might do.
February’s footprint, by suburb
a quarter or more of the outline a tenth some a trace none mapped
Each suburb shaded by the share of its outline under mapped February 2011 liquefaction, a patch files under the suburb its middle crosses. 82 suburbs hold mapped ground; the rest are not absent so much as unmarked, the survey only drew what it could see from the air and visit on the ground.
The suburbs, wettest first
Questions, answered briefly
The surveys drew 7,382 mapped patches, about 16,933 hectares of the city’s footprint, where the ground failed across September 2010 and February 2011. The footprints overlap but differ: ground that moved in one shake did not always move in the other.
Bromley tops the roll, the survey drew about 603 hectares of mapped ground inside its outline. The eastern river suburbs carry the record: the ground that was wet first is the ground that moved.
No, a patch is the survey’s footprint of an effect seen from the air and on the ground, not a finding about any one address. The per-address answer lives at /before; this page counts the patches, not the claims.
Environment Canterbury’s open layers, the post-quake mapping GNS and ECan made from aerial imagery and site visits after each shake. A patch marked "probable" or "possible" is the survey’s own certainty, kept verbatim; patches the surveyors could not call are dropped, not guessed.
Also in the earthquakes
- The sequenceevery shake since 2010, counted
- Earthquakes, livethe ones that just landed
- The faultsthe traces under the plains
- The land gradesTC1, TC2, TC3
- The red zonethe land the Crown wrote off
- The rebuild’s receiptsSCIRT’s photograph archive
- The earthquakes, explainedwhat happened and why
- Liquefaction, explainedwhy the east failed
- The rebuild, explainedthe machinery that put it back
The record behind this
Environment Canterbury’s open liquefaction layers, the mapping GNS and ECan made from aerial imagery and site visits after September 2010 and February 2011. A patch is a footprint of an effect the survey could see, kept with the survey’s own certainty; patches it could not call are dropped, not guessed. A patch is not a finding about any one address, the point answer lives at /before.
This page as markdown: /liquefaction.md · the patches as data: /liquefaction.geojson · /liquefaction.json · the story: why the east liquefied · the shakes that did it: /sequence · the faults under it: /faults · what the Crown drew over it: /redzone · what the ground was graded: /technical-categories · what the model expects: /vulnerability · every roll, counted: /geography.