Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Bryndwr | Ilam | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,850 2023 | 10,730 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 6,243 indicative | 10,224 indicative |
| Census households | 2,316 | 2,673 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 18% | 10% |
| 65+ (Census) | 16% | 10% |
| Area | 2.13 km² | 3.85 km² |
| People per km² | 4,624 | 2,787 |
| Reports filed | 3,654 | 5,640 |
| Rank on the roll | 40th of 108 | 22nd of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 1,715 | 1,465 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2023-12-26 16 reports | 2023-11-25 23 reports |
| Crashes on record | 182 2 fatal · 32 serious | 313 2 fatal · 45 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | — | 1 biggest M3.1 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | TC2 543.1% of the outline | — |
| Flooded on record | — | 0.3% 1 event |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | — | — |
| The wild ledger | — | 1% of the outline |
| The kept view | — | 1% of the outline |
| The waiting water | 0% high-hazard · 26% managed | 0% high-hazard · 20% managed |
| The quiet lines | all of the outline · bird-strike buffer | all of the outline · 44% under the airport’s contours · bird-strike buffer |
| The drawn water | 69 reaches (Taylor Stream, Wai-iti Stream) · 3% setback strips | 102 reaches (Waimairi Stream, Avon River) · 3% setback strips |
| The allowed shape | 11% under density overlays · Suburban | 18% under density overlays · Suburban Density Transition |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 1,257 frames filed · 2011–2016 | 1,304 frames filed · 2010–2014 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Nor'West Arc | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Nor'West Arc, Uni-Cycle |
| The remembered names | – | – |
| The rules on the ground | 8 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 13 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 1 parcel none current | 6 parcels 3 current |
| Made ground on file | 42 parcels 2 unvouched | 107 parcels all vouched or natural |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 1 parcel none verified | 1 parcel none verified |
| The model’s verdict | medium 75% of the outline · 3 free-face flags | possible 56% of the outline |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 1,322 trees 2 veterans · 582 remembered felled | 2,438 trees 42 veterans · 1,205 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Residential Suburban 69% of the outline · 79% residential | Residential Suburban 40% of the outline · 58% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 2% of the outline 1 designation · learning | 3% of the outline 3 designations · learning |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | 30% of the outline 15 matters · utilities, heritage |
| The listed city | – | 16 scheduled items 10 highly significant |
| The usual complaints | Dumped Rubbish 667 · Water Leak 487 · Graffiti 406 | Roading/Streets 763 · Dumped Rubbish 662 · Graffiti 588 |
| Schools | 3 | 3 |
| Parks | 3 | 7 |
| Facilities | 0 | 0 |
| Tracks | 9 | 30 |
| Bus stops | 25 | 38 |
| Bus routes through | 6 | 7 |
| Heritage places | 1 | 15 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Bryndwr's page · Ilam's page
Questions, answered briefly
Bryndwr counts 9,850 people (2023) to Ilam's 10,730; Bryndwr covers 2.13 km², Ilam 3.85 km²; the record holds 3,654 reports for Bryndwr and 5,640 for Ilam.
Ilam, 15 on the heritage register to the other’s 1.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.