Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Cashmere | Saint Martins | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,900 2023 | — |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 6,690 indicative | 2,802 indicative |
| Census households | 2,508 | 1,149 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 19% | 19% |
| 65+ (Census) | 19% | 18% |
| Area | 13.19 km² | 1.15 km² |
| People per km² | 523 | — |
| Reports filed | 9,776 | 3,384 |
| Rank on the roll | 11th of 108 | 43rd of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 741 | 2,943 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2022-10-11 69 reports | 2022-09-12 18 reports |
| Crashes on record | 315 7 fatal · 83 serious | 76 0 fatal · 12 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 205 biggest M5.6 | 4 biggest M3.9 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | 0.2% 3 ha | — |
| The 2011 grade | TC3 0.9% of the outline | TC2 70.9% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 2.5% 5 events | 10.1% 4 events |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | 14% of the outline +79% broad overlay | 4% of the outline +4% broad overlay |
| The remembered ground | 0% of the outline +4% silent-file | 2% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | — | 2% of the outline |
| The kept view | 65% of the outline +49% outstanding | 2% of the outline |
| The waiting water | 0% high-hazard · 1% managed · 24 ponding | 3% high-hazard · 15% managed |
| The quiet lines | – | – |
| The drawn water | 119 reaches (Scotts Drain, Sibleys Drain) · 9% setback strips · held edge | 31 reaches (Heathcote / Opawaho River, Victory Drain Branch No 1) · 9% setback strips |
| The allowed shape | – | 9% under density overlays · Suburban |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 4,305 frames filed · 2010–2016 | 2,517 frames filed · 2010–2016 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · Nor'West Arc, Ōpāwaho River | 0.0 km inside the outline · Southern Lights |
| The remembered names | 14 plaques · Cashmere Village Green, Cracroft Reserve | 5 plaques · Heathcote Riverbank Tr South, St Martins Park |
| The rules on the ground | 34 drawn rules · Rapaki Runanga | 8 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 11 parcels 4 current | 6 parcels 2 current |
| Made ground on file | 163 parcels 5 unvouched | 44 parcels 8 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | 510 rocks 212 fell · 57 wobble easy | 58 rocks 53 fell |
| Cleanups on file | 6 parcels 1 verified | 7 parcels 7 verified |
| The model’s verdict | unlikely 90% of the outline · 3 free-face flags | medium 43% of the outline · 4 free-face flags |
| Engineered defences | 4 defences 1 rated poor | – |
| The canopy | 1,759 trees 39 veterans · 730 remembered felled | 891 trees 7 veterans · 459 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Rural Port Hills 37% of the outline · 22% residential | Residential Suburban 54% of the outline · 72% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 1% of the outline 1 designation · movement | 4% of the outline 3 designations · learning |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | – |
| The listed city | 13 scheduled items 5 highly significant | 1 scheduled item none top-graded |
| The usual complaints | Water Leak 1,276 · Graffiti 1,176 · Roading/Streets 851 | Graffiti 680 · Water Leak 552 · Roading/Streets 291 |
| Schools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks | 27 | 3 |
| Facilities | 2 | 0 |
| Tracks | 28 | 16 |
| Bus stops | 36 | 18 |
| Bus routes through | 3 | 3 |
| Heritage places | 14 | 1 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Cashmere's page · Saint Martins's page
Questions, answered briefly
Cashmere covers 13.19 km², Saint Martins 1.15 km²; the record holds 9,776 reports for Cashmere and 3,384 for Saint Martins.
Cashmere, 14 on the heritage register to the other’s 1.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.