Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Cracroft | Spreydon | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | — | 9,970 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 3,540 indicative | 9,279 indicative |
| Census households | 1,311 | 3,834 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 19% | 16% |
| 65+ (Census) | 19% | 13% |
| Area | 2.7 km² | 2.65 km² |
| People per km² | — | 3,762 |
| Reports filed | 1,025 | 7,319 |
| Rank on the roll | 76th of 108 | 16th of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 380 | 2,762 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2016-04-13 10 reports | 2018-01-15 43 reports |
| Crashes on record | 6 0 fatal · 0 serious | 181 1 fatal · 41 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 77 biggest M4.3 | 5 biggest M4.4 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | TC3 7.8% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 29.5% 1 event | 10.8% 5 events |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | 4% of the outline +61% broad overlay | — |
| The remembered ground | — | 1% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | — | 1% of the outline |
| The kept view | 26% of the outline | 1% of the outline |
| The waiting water | 15% high-hazard · 25% managed · 9 ponding | 0% high-hazard · 2% managed |
| The quiet lines | – | 1% of the outline · bird-strike buffer |
| The drawn water | 23 reaches (Cashmere Valley Drain, Worsleys Drain) · 10% setback strips · held edge | 12 reaches (Wilderness Drain, Heathcote / Opawaho River) · 1% setback strips · held edge |
| The allowed shape | – | 67% under density overlays · Medium Density |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 382 frames filed · 2011–2013 | 1,463 frames filed · 2001–2017 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Little River Link, Nor'West Arc +1 |
| The remembered names | 5 plaques · Holmcroft Reserve, Cashmere Stream Esplanade Rese | 5 plaques · Barrington Park, Spreydon Domain |
| The rules on the ground | 3 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 11 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | – | 9 parcels 5 current |
| Made ground on file | 53 parcels 1 unvouched | 52 parcels 4 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | – | 3 parcels none verified |
| The model’s verdict | unlikely 61% of the outline | medium 86% of the outline · 1 free-face flag |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 344 trees 12 veterans · 69 remembered felled | 1,451 trees 57 veterans · 582 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Rural Port Hills 30% of the outline · 35% residential | Medium density residential zone 67% of the outline · 73% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | – | 2% of the outline 2 designations · learning |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | – |
| The listed city | 1 scheduled item none top-graded | 2 scheduled items none top-graded |
| The usual complaints | Parks 111 · Roading/Streets 110 · Water Leak 86 | Graffiti 898 · Dumped Rubbish 877 · Water Leak 740 |
| Schools | 0 | 3 |
| Parks | 5 | 9 |
| Facilities | 0 | 1 |
| Tracks | 2 | 17 |
| Bus stops | — | 36 |
| Bus routes through | — | 5 |
| Heritage places | 2 | 4 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Cracroft's page · Spreydon's page
Questions, answered briefly
Cracroft covers 2.7 km², Spreydon 2.65 km²; the record holds 1,025 reports for Cracroft and 7,319 for Spreydon.
Spreydon, 4 on the heritage register to the other’s 2.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.