Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Hornby South | Prebbleton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | — | 5,750 June 2025 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 4,554 indicative | — |
| Census households | 1,740 | — |
| Under 15 (Census) | 18% | — |
| 65+ (Census) | 15% | — |
| Area | 3.49 km² | 5.29 km² |
| People per km² | — | 1,087 |
| Reports filed | 513 | 68 |
| Rank on the roll | 87th of 108 | 102nd of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 147 | 13 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2018 |
| Busiest day | 2023-05-08 19 reports | 2020-02-19 2 reports |
| Crashes on record | 67 6 fatal · 20 serious | 0 |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 2 biggest M3.8 | 18 biggest M3.7 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | — |
| Flooded on record | — | — |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | — | — |
| The wild ledger | — | — |
| The kept view | — | — |
| The waiting water | — | — |
| The quiet lines | 83% of the outline · bird-strike buffer | – |
| The drawn water | – | – |
| The allowed shape | – | – |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 188 frames filed · 2010–2013 | – |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · Little River Link | 0.0 km inside the outline · Little River Link |
| The remembered names | – | – |
| The rules on the ground | 1 drawn rule · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 1 drawn rule · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 30 parcels 12 current | – |
| Made ground on file | 59 parcels 7 unvouched | – |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 4 parcels none verified | – |
| The model’s verdict | unlikely 57% of the outline | – |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 281 trees no veterans · 30 remembered felled | – |
| The plan’s word | Industrial Heavy 57% of the outline | – |
| The plan’s reservations | 4% of the outline 3 designations · movement | – |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | – |
| The listed city | – | – |
| The usual complaints | Roading/Streets 86 · Graffiti 59 · Water Leak 35 | Dumped Rubbish 18 · Rubbish/Recycling 14 · General Request 9 |
| Schools | 0 | 0 |
| Parks | 3 | 2 |
| Facilities | 0 | 1 |
| Tracks | 2 | 3 |
| Bus stops | — | 7 |
| Bus routes through | — | 2 |
| Heritage places | 0 | 2 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Hornby South's page · Prebbleton's page
Questions, answered briefly
Hornby South covers 3.49 km², Prebbleton 5.29 km²; the record holds 513 reports for Hornby South and 68 for Prebbleton.
Prebbleton, 2 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.