Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Ilam | Russley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,730 2023 | 2,440 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 10,224 indicative | 1,074 indicative |
| Census households | 2,673 | 429 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 10% | 18% |
| 65+ (Census) | 10% | 31% |
| Area | 3.85 km² | 1.3 km² |
| People per km² | 2,787 | 1,877 |
| Reports filed | 5,653 | 1,118 |
| Rank on the roll | 22nd of 108 | 73rd of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 1,468 | 860 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2023-11-25 23 reports | 2023-01-11 15 reports |
| Crashes on record | 313 2 fatal · 45 serious | 108 7 fatal · 30 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 1 biggest M3.1 | 1 biggest M3.5 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | — |
| Flooded on record | 0.3% 1 event | — |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | — | — |
| The wild ledger | 1% of the outline | — |
| The kept view | 1% of the outline | — |
| The waiting water | 0% high-hazard · 20% managed | — |
| The quiet lines | all of the outline · 44% under the airport’s contours · bird-strike buffer | all of the outline · 16% under the airport’s contours · bird-strike buffer |
| The drawn water | 102 reaches (Waimairi Stream, Avon River) · 3% setback strips | 14 reaches (Ilam Stream, Pinehurst Crescent Drain) · 3% setback strips |
| The allowed shape | 18% under density overlays · Suburban Density Transition | – |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 1,304 frames filed · 2010–2014 | 415 frames filed · 2011–2014 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Nor'West Arc, Uni-Cycle | 0.0 km inside the outline |
| The remembered names | – | 3 plaques · Avonhead Park, Manakura 1 Drainage Reserve |
| The rules on the ground | 13 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 3 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 6 parcels 3 current | 4 parcels 1 current |
| Made ground on file | 107 parcels all vouched or natural | 20 parcels 3 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 1 parcel none verified | 2 parcels 2 verified |
| The model’s verdict | possible 56% of the outline | low 100% of the outline |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 2,437 trees 42 veterans · 1,206 remembered felled | 572 trees 1 veteran · 299 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Residential Suburban 40% of the outline · 58% residential | Residential Suburban 46% of the outline · 48% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 3% of the outline 3 designations · learning | 7% of the outline 7 designations · movement, learning |
| The plan’s exceptions | 30% of the outline 15 matters · utilities, heritage | – |
| The listed city | 16 scheduled items 10 highly significant | – |
| The usual complaints | Roading/Streets 763 · Dumped Rubbish 662 · Graffiti 588 | Roading/Streets 191 · Water Leak 127 · Overgrown Vegetation 75 |
| Schools | 3 | 0 |
| Parks | 7 | 3 |
| Facilities | 0 | 0 |
| Tracks | 30 | 3 |
| Bus stops | 38 | 12 |
| Bus routes through | 7 | 3 |
| Heritage places | 15 | 0 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Ilam's page · Russley's page
Questions, answered briefly
Ilam counts 10,730 people (2023) to Russley's 2,440; Ilam covers 3.85 km², Russley 1.3 km²; the record holds 5,653 reports for Ilam and 1,118 for Russley.
Ilam, 15 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.