Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Ouruhia | Spencerville | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | — | 790 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 1,392 indicative | 759 indicative |
| Census households | 498 | 264 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 15% | 19% |
| 65+ (Census) | 30% | 13% |
| Area | 7.49 km² | 2.85 km² |
| People per km² | — | 277 |
| Reports filed | 784 | 369 |
| Rank on the roll | 81st of 108 | 93rd of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 105 | 129 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2016 |
| Busiest day | 2024-11-05 14 reports | 2022-02-13 4 reports |
| Crashes on record | 64 2 fatal · 21 serious | 9 0 fatal · 5 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 3 biggest M4.5 | — |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | TC3 10.1% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 42.0% 1 event | 45.8% 2 events |
| The sea’s reach | 12% of the outline | 52% of the outline |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | 2% of the outline +26% silent-file | 35% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | 6% of the outline | 41% of the outline |
| The kept view | 2% of the outline | 73% of the outline +25% outstanding |
| The waiting water | 21% high-hazard · 38% managed · 13 ponding | 12% high-hazard · 76% managed · 1 ponding |
| The quiet lines | – | – |
| The drawn water | 48 reaches (Kaputone Creek, Styx River) · 6% setback strips · held edge | 6 reaches (Styx River, Lower Styx Drain South) · 5% setback strips · held edge |
| The allowed shape | – | – |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 45 frames filed | 218 frames filed · 2012–2016 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline | – |
| The remembered names | – | – |
| The rules on the ground | 3 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 8 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 2 parcels none current | – |
| Made ground on file | 9 parcels 1 unvouched | 27 parcels all vouched or natural |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | – | – |
| The model’s verdict | possible 100% of the outline | possible 75% of the outline |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 181 trees 14 veterans · 60 remembered felled | 278 trees no veterans · 225 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Rural Urban Fringe 57% of the outline | Rural Waimakariri 28% of the outline · 9% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 2% of the outline 3 designations · movement | – |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | – |
| The listed city | 2 scheduled items none top-graded | – |
| The usual complaints | Dumped Rubbish 377 · Rubbish/Recycling 103 · Parks 46 | Parks 47 · Dumped Rubbish 44 · Roading/Streets 24 |
| Schools | 1 | 0 |
| Parks | 5 | 4 |
| Facilities | 0 | 0 |
| Tracks | 1 | 0 |
| Bus stops | — | — |
| Bus routes through | — | — |
| Heritage places | 2 | 1 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Ouruhia's page · Spencerville's page
Questions, answered briefly
Ouruhia covers 7.49 km², Spencerville 2.85 km²; the record holds 784 reports for Ouruhia and 369 for Spencerville.
Ouruhia, 2 on the heritage register to the other’s 1.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.