Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Spreydon | Sydenham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,970 2023 | 6,970 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 9,279 indicative | 6,774 indicative |
| Census households | 3,834 | 3,084 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 16% | — |
| 65+ (Census) | 13% | — |
| Area | 2.65 km² | 3.04 km² |
| People per km² | 3,762 | 2,293 |
| Reports filed | 7,319 | 23,728 |
| Rank on the roll | 16th of 108 | 2nd of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 2,762 | 7,805 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2018-01-15 43 reports | 2023-08-30 144 reports |
| Crashes on record | 181 1 fatal · 41 serious | 819 11 fatal · 139 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 5 biggest M4.4 | 7 biggest M4.7 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | TC3 7.8% of the outline | TC3 7.2% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 10.8% 5 events | 1.4% 3 events |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | 1% of the outline | — |
| The wild ledger | 1% of the outline | — |
| The kept view | 1% of the outline | — |
| The waiting water | 0% high-hazard · 2% managed | 0% high-hazard · 34% managed |
| The quiet lines | 1% of the outline · bird-strike buffer | 3% of the outline |
| The drawn water | 12 reaches (Wilderness Drain, Heathcote / Opawaho River) · 1% setback strips · held edge | 32 reaches (Jacksons Creek Upper, Heathcote / Opawaho River) · 2% setback strips |
| The allowed shape | 67% under density overlays · Medium Density | 37% under density overlays · Medium Density |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 1,463 frames filed · 2001–2017 | 7,352 frames filed · 2009–2017 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Little River Link, Nor'West Arc +1 | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Quarryman's Trail, Southern Lights +1 |
| The remembered names | 5 plaques · Barrington Park, Spreydon Domain | 8 plaques · Sydenham School Memorial, Sydenham Park |
| The rules on the ground | 11 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 10 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 9 parcels 5 current | 75 parcels 39 current |
| Made ground on file | 52 parcels 4 unvouched | 65 parcels 20 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 3 parcels none verified | 16 parcels none verified |
| The model’s verdict | medium 86% of the outline · 1 free-face flag | medium 81% of the outline · 2 free-face flags |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 1,452 trees 57 veterans · 582 remembered felled | 1,385 trees 31 veterans · 660 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Medium density residential zone 67% of the outline · 73% residential | Medium density residential zone 33% of the outline · 40% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 2% of the outline 2 designations · learning | 1% of the outline 1 designation · movement |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | 4% of the outline 8 matters · residential, heritage, utilities |
| The listed city | 2 scheduled items none top-graded | 10 scheduled items none top-graded |
| The usual complaints | Graffiti 898 · Dumped Rubbish 877 · Water Leak 740 | Graffiti 6,894 · Dumped Rubbish 2,439 · Graffiti on a fence, building or structure 1,856 |
| Schools | 3 | 0 |
| Parks | 9 | 14 |
| Facilities | 1 | 0 |
| Tracks | 17 | 18 |
| Bus stops | 36 | 41 |
| Bus routes through | 5 | 8 |
| Heritage places | 4 | 10 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Spreydon's page · Sydenham's page
Questions, answered briefly
Spreydon counts 9,970 people (2023) to Sydenham's 6,970; Spreydon covers 2.65 km², Sydenham 3.04 km²; the record holds 7,319 reports for Spreydon and 23,728 for Sydenham.
Sydenham, 10 on the heritage register to the other’s 4.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.