Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Sumner | te-onepoto-taylors-mistake | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,490 2023 | — |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 3,414 indicative | 78 indicative |
| Census households | 1,344 | 30 |
| Under 15 (Census) | — | 12% |
| 65+ (Census) | — | 12% |
| Area | 11.99 km² | 0.17 km² |
| People per km² | 291 | — |
| Reports filed | 4,633 | 175 |
| Rank on the roll | 32nd of 108 | 97th of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 386 | 1,029 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2021 |
| Busiest day | 2023-06-20 49 reports | 2023-06-11 13 reports |
| Crashes on record | 75 4 fatal · 22 serious | 2 0 fatal · 1 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 101 biggest M5.3 | 3 biggest M3.6 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | 2.5% 30 ha | 8.9% 2 ha |
| The 2011 grade | TC2 6.3% of the outline | — |
| Flooded on record | 2.5% 2 events | — |
| The sea’s reach | 10% of the outline | 44% of the outline |
| Slope-hazard bands | 10% of the outline +80% broad overlay | 10% of the outline +46% broad overlay |
| The remembered ground | 55% of the outline | 86% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | — | — |
| The kept view | 83% of the outline +82% outstanding | 74% of the outline +33% outstanding |
| The waiting water | 0% high-hazard · 6% managed | — |
| The quiet lines | – | – |
| The drawn water | 87 reaches (Sumner Stream, Richmond Hill Waterway) · 8% setback strips · held edge | 3 reaches (Mcclurg Watercourse, Taylors Mistake Road Drain) · 6% setback strips · held edge |
| The allowed shape | 0% under density overlays · 9 bach settlements | 0% under density overlays · 36 bach settlements |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 1,042 frames filed · 2011–2017 | 44 frames filed |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · Te Ara Ihutai Coastal Pathway | – |
| The remembered names | 24 plaques · Scarborough Park, Port Hills 11 Rrz Land | 3 plaques · Taylors Mistake Beach, Godley Beach Park |
| The rules on the ground | 29 drawn rules · Rapaki Runanga | 12 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 2 parcels 1 current | – |
| Made ground on file | 54 parcels 2 unvouched | 1 parcel all vouched or natural |
| Surveyed rocks | 6,354 rocks 3,792 fell · 1,176 wobble easy | 4 rocks 3 fell |
| Cleanups on file | 1 parcel none verified | – |
| The model’s verdict | unlikely 43% of the outline | – |
| Engineered defences | 47 defences none rated poor | – |
| The canopy | 683 trees 5 veterans · 444 remembered felled | 36 trees no veterans · 1 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Open Space Natural 68% of the outline · 11% residential | Open Space Coastal 38% of the outline · 24% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 1% of the outline 2 designations · power & signal, learning | – |
| The plan’s exceptions | 1% of the outline 3 matters · section 6 | – |
| The listed city | 13 scheduled items 2 highly significant | 32 scheduled items none top-graded |
| The usual complaints | Parks 483 · Graffiti 479 · Water Leak 466 | Water Leak 44 · Park - General Request 13 · Rubbish and Bins - General 11 |
| Schools | 3 | 0 |
| Parks | 13 | 1 |
| Facilities | 1 | 0 |
| Tracks | 9 | 0 |
| Bus stops | 24 | — |
| Bus routes through | 1 | — |
| Heritage places | 39 | 18 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Sumner's page · te-onepoto-taylors-mistake's page
Questions, answered briefly
Sumner covers 11.99 km², te-onepoto-taylors-mistake 0.17 km²; the record holds 4,633 reports for Sumner and 175 for te-onepoto-taylors-mistake.
Sumner, 39 on the heritage register to the other’s 18.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.