Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Burwood | Parklands | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,360 2023 | 10,420 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 3,564 indicative | 10,152 indicative |
| Census households | 1,329 | 3,627 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 21% | 20% |
| 65+ (Census) | 15% | 15% |
| Area | 5.88 km² | 5.62 km² |
| People per km² | 1,082 | 1,854 |
| Reports filed | 8,194 | 4,955 |
| Rank on the roll | 15th of 108 | 29th of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 1,394 | 882 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2023-10-30 59 reports | 2020-08-25 25 reports |
| Crashes on record | 219 1 fatal · 44 serious | 94 0 fatal · 18 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 5 biggest M3.3 | 4 biggest M3.5 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | 10.2% 60 ha | — |
| The 2011 grade | TC3 31.1% of the outline | TC2 28.2% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 43.2% 2 events | 6.8% 1 event |
| The sea’s reach | 3% of the outline | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | 52% of the outline | 4% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | 28% of the outline | — |
| The kept view | 23% of the outline +19% outstanding | — |
| The waiting water | 27% high-hazard · 65% managed | 0% high-hazard · 6% managed |
| The quiet lines | – | – |
| The drawn water | 81 reaches (Angela Stream, Horseshoe Lake Outlet) · 10% setback strips · held edge | 26 reaches (Putake Drain, Snellings Drain) · 1% setback strips |
| The allowed shape | 1% under density overlays · Suburban | 2% under density overlays · Suburban |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 3,224 frames filed · 2001–2016 | 3,945 frames filed · 2011–2017 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline | 0.0 km inside the outline |
| The remembered names | 10 plaques · Donnell Sports Park, Brooker Monument | 8 plaques · Parklands Reserve, Alpine View Drainage Reserve |
| The rules on the ground | 16 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 5 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 10 parcels 3 current | 8 parcels 4 current |
| Made ground on file | 438 parcels 7 unvouched | 244 parcels 2 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 2 parcels none verified | 2 parcels none verified |
| The model’s verdict | high 48% of the outline · 9 free-face flags | high 37% of the outline · 1 free-face flag |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 2,250 trees 72 veterans · 1,404 remembered felled | 3,118 trees 11 veterans · 1,611 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Residential Suburban 29% of the outline · 32% residential | Residential Suburban 40% of the outline · 43% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 2% of the outline 3 designations · movement | – |
| The plan’s exceptions | 3% of the outline 1 matter · infrastructure | – |
| The listed city | – | – |
| The usual complaints | Graffiti 1,905 · Rubbish/Recycling 1,280 · Dumped Rubbish 995 | Graffiti 735 · Parks 537 · Roading/Streets 526 |
| Schools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks | 18 | 37 |
| Facilities | 0 | 1 |
| Tracks | 25 | 8 |
| Bus stops | 46 | 40 |
| Bus routes through | 5 | 3 |
| Heritage places | 0 | 0 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Burwood's page · Parklands's page
Questions, answered briefly
Burwood counts 6,360 people (2023) to Parklands's 10,420; Burwood covers 5.88 km², Parklands 5.62 km²; the record holds 8,194 reports for Burwood and 4,955 for Parklands.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.