Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Casebrook | Harewood | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,720 2023 | 1,390 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 6,090 indicative | 1,329 indicative |
| Census households | 2,382 | 501 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 15% | 14% |
| 65+ (Census) | 23% | 25% |
| Area | 3.44 km² | 11.51 km² |
| People per km² | 1,953 | 121 |
| Reports filed | 2,977 | 2,069 |
| Rank on the roll | 51st of 108 | 62nd of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 865 | 180 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2026-09-04 15 reports | 2026-01-29 9 reports |
| Crashes on record | 75 1 fatal · 21 serious | 194 7 fatal · 38 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | — | 1 biggest M3.2 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | TC2 13.4% of the outline | TC2 2.3% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 11.8% 1 event | — |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | — | — |
| The wild ledger | 3% of the outline | 3% of the outline |
| The kept view | 4% of the outline | 2% of the outline |
| The waiting water | 0% high-hazard · 41% managed | 4% high-hazard · 2% managed |
| The quiet lines | all of the outline · 4% under the airport’s contours · bird-strike buffer | all of the outline · 95% under the airport’s contours · bird-strike buffer |
| The drawn water | 105 reaches (Styx Drain, Cavendish Stream) · 9% setback strips · held edge | 62 reaches (Otukaikino Creek, Styx River) · 4% setback strips · held edge |
| The allowed shape | – | – |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 791 frames filed · 2010–2014 | 231 frames filed · 2011–2013 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Northern Line | 0.0 km inside the outline · Wheels to Wings |
| The remembered names | 1 plaque · Tulett Park | 1 plaque · Roto Kohatu |
| The rules on the ground | 6 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 6 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 4 parcels 1 current | 11 parcels 4 current |
| Made ground on file | 218 parcels 3 unvouched | 135 parcels 7 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 4 parcels none verified | 3 parcels 2 verified |
| The model’s verdict | possible 52% of the outline | possible 60% of the outline |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 2,599 trees 4 veterans · 672 remembered felled | 1,964 trees 20 veterans · 609 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Residential New Neighbourhood 34% of the outline · 68% residential | Rural Waimakariri 26% of the outline · 7% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 2% of the outline 2 designations · learning, movement | 9% of the outline 3 designations · movement |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | – |
| The listed city | – | 4 scheduled items 1 highly significant |
| The usual complaints | Dumped Rubbish 277 · Overgrown Vegetation 253 · Parks 251 | Dumped Rubbish 297 · Roading/Streets 280 · Parks 211 |
| Schools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks | 13 | 14 |
| Facilities | 1 | 0 |
| Tracks | 8 | 6 |
| Bus stops | 32 | 12 |
| Bus routes through | 3 | 3 |
| Heritage places | 0 | 5 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Casebrook's page · Harewood's page
Questions, answered briefly
Casebrook counts 6,720 people (2023) to Harewood's 1,390; Casebrook covers 3.44 km², Harewood 11.51 km²; the record holds 2,977 reports for Casebrook and 2,069 for Harewood.
Harewood, 5 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.