Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Marshland | Redwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,540 2023 | 8,400 2023 |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 1,392 indicative | 8,079 indicative |
| Census households | 498 | 3,075 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 15% | 18% |
| 65+ (Census) | 30% | 16% |
| Area | 8.75 km² | 4.38 km² |
| People per km² | 176 | 1,918 |
| Reports filed | 2,470 | 4,975 |
| Rank on the roll | 56th of 108 | 28th of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 282 | 1,136 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2021-06-02 19 reports | 2020-01-07 13 reports |
| Crashes on record | 253 5 fatal · 62 serious | 271 5 fatal · 51 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 4 biggest M3.8 | 1 biggest M3.3 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | TC2 105.1% of the outline |
| Flooded on record | 19.6% 1 event | 20.0% 1 event |
| The sea’s reach | — | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | — | — |
| The remembered ground | — | 1% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | 2% of the outline | 2% of the outline |
| The kept view | 1% of the outline | 1% of the outline |
| The waiting water | 3% high-hazard · 15% managed · 1 ponding | 0% high-hazard · 31% managed · 1 ponding |
| The quiet lines | 31% of the outline · bird-strike buffer | all of the outline · bird-strike buffer |
| The drawn water | 162 reaches (Rhodes Drain, Canal Reserve Drain) · 4% setback strips · held edge | 53 reaches (Prestons Creek, Horners Drain) · 3% setback strips · held edge |
| The allowed shape | 1% under density overlays · New Neighbourhood | 3% under density overlays · New Neighbourhood |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 57 frames filed · 2011–2014 | 1,355 frames filed · 2010–2014 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline | 0.0 km inside the outline · 0.0 km separated · Northern Line |
| The remembered names | 4 plaques · Little Poland Park, John Lindsay Drainage Reserve | 2 plaques · Murchison Park, Owen Mitchell Park |
| The rules on the ground | 4 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 7 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 2 parcels 2 current | 5 parcels 3 current |
| Made ground on file | 309 parcels 4 unvouched | 213 parcels 2 unvouched |
| Surveyed rocks | – | – |
| Cleanups on file | 2 parcels none verified | – |
| The model’s verdict | possible 70% of the outline | possible 54% of the outline |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 2,388 trees 10 veterans · 470 remembered felled | 2,703 trees 7 veterans · 1,203 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Rural Urban Fringe 57% of the outline · 33% residential | Residential Suburban 46% of the outline · 67% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 1% of the outline 3 designations · movement | 19% of the outline 10 designations · movement, learning |
| The plan’s exceptions | 3% of the outline 1 matter · infrastructure | – |
| The listed city | 1 scheduled item none top-graded | – |
| The usual complaints | Overgrown Vegetation 298 · Roading/Streets 295 · Parks 271 | Graffiti 805 · Water Leak 455 · Roading/Streets 439 |
| Schools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks | 3 | 16 |
| Facilities | 0 | 1 |
| Tracks | 8 | 12 |
| Bus stops | 10 | 34 |
| Bus routes through | 1 | 7 |
| Heritage places | 1 | 0 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Marshland's page · Redwood's page
Questions, answered briefly
Marshland counts 1,540 people (2023) to Redwood's 8,400; Marshland covers 8.75 km², Redwood 4.38 km²; the record holds 2,470 reports for Marshland and 4,975 for Redwood.
Marshland, 1 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.