Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Redcliffs | Richmond Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,150 2023 | — |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 2,061 indicative | 78 indicative |
| Census households | 891 | 30 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 13% | 12% |
| 65+ (Census) | 27% | 12% |
| Area | 1.9 km² | 0.59 km² |
| People per km² | 1,132 | — |
| Reports filed | 2,456 | 323 |
| Rank on the roll | 57th of 108 | 94th of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 1,293 | 547 |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2022-11-17 20 reports | 2022-02-24 3 reports |
| Crashes on record | 48 1 fatal · 13 serious | 1 0 fatal · 0 serious |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 18 biggest M6.0 | 10 biggest M5.3 |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | 5.7% 11 ha | — |
| The 2011 grade | TC2 17.3% of the outline | — |
| Flooded on record | 46.9% 2 events | — |
| The sea’s reach | 24% of the outline | 1% of the outline |
| Slope-hazard bands | 14% of the outline +55% broad overlay | 3% of the outline +95% broad overlay |
| The remembered ground | 100% of the outline | 100% of the outline |
| The wild ledger | 2% of the outline | — |
| The kept view | 23% of the outline +20% outstanding | 33% of the outline +33% outstanding |
| The waiting water | 3% high-hazard · 18% managed | — |
| The quiet lines | – | – |
| The drawn water | 22 reaches (Glenstrae Stream Drain, Balmoral Drain) · 9% setback strips · held edge | 14 reaches (Richmond Hill Waterway, Richmond Hill Road Drain) · 5% setback strips |
| The allowed shape | 1% under density overlays · Hills | – |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 2,207 frames filed · 2010–2017 | 141 frames filed · 2011–2014 |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline · Te Ara Ihutai Coastal Pathway | – |
| The remembered names | 15 plaques · Barnett Park Sports Grounds, Redcliffs Public Library | – |
| The rules on the ground | 8 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga | 3 drawn rules · Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga |
| On the hazard register | 7 parcels 2 current | – |
| Made ground on file | 88 parcels 3 unvouched | 3 parcels all vouched or natural |
| Surveyed rocks | 242 rocks 234 fell | 408 rocks 400 fell · 8 wobble easy |
| Cleanups on file | 1 parcel none verified | – |
| The model’s verdict | unlikely 68% of the outline · 2 free-face flags | unlikely 98% of the outline |
| Engineered defences | 1 defence none rated poor | – |
| The canopy | 396 trees no veterans · 159 remembered felled | 49 trees no veterans · 17 remembered felled |
| The plan’s word | Residential Hills 42% of the outline · 59% residential | Residential Hills 51% of the outline · 51% residential |
| The plan’s reservations | 1% of the outline 1 designation · learning | – |
| The plan’s exceptions | 6% of the outline 13 matters · section 6 | – |
| The listed city | 3 scheduled items 2 highly significant | – |
| The usual complaints | Water Leak 471 · Graffiti 208 · Roading/Streets 192 | Water Leak 67 · Roading/Streets 52 · Overgrown Vegetation 37 |
| Schools | 1 | 0 |
| Parks | 11 | 2 |
| Facilities | 0 | 0 |
| Tracks | 1 | 0 |
| Bus stops | 8 | — |
| Bus routes through | 2 | — |
| Heritage places | 4 | 0 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Redcliffs's page · Richmond Hill's page
Questions, answered briefly
Redcliffs covers 1.9 km², Richmond Hill 0.59 km²; the record holds 2,456 reports for Redcliffs and 323 for Richmond Hill.
Redcliffs, 4 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.