Suburb vs suburb
Pick two suburbs, the same record answers for both. Reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops and the places the register remembers, in one table with the caveats still attached.
Counts are what the public record holds, a report tally measures the stream, not the suburb’s virtue.
Or try one: the city vs Riccarton · Linwood vs Phillipstown · Akaroa vs Lyttelton
| Cass Bay | Rapaki | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | — | — |
| 2023 Census (SA1 join) | 3,117 indicative | 3,117 indicative |
| Census households | 1,353 | 1,353 |
| Under 15 (Census) | 15% | 15% |
| 65+ (Census) | 17% | 17% |
| Area | 2.7 km² | — |
| People per km² | — | — |
| Reports filed | 538 | 165 |
| Rank on the roll | 86th of 108 | 98th of 108 |
| Reports per km² | 199 | — |
| First report on record | 2015 | 2015 |
| Busiest day | 2022-01-16 8 reports | 2024-07-22 4 reports |
| Crashes on record | 16 0 fatal · 2 serious | — |
| Epicentres inside the outline | 11 biggest M4.2 | — |
| Of the outline, red-zoned | — | — |
| The 2011 grade | — | — |
| Flooded on record | — | — |
| The sea’s reach | 1% of the outline | — |
| Slope-hazard bands | 21% of the outline +79% broad overlay | — |
| The remembered ground | 17% of the outline +56% silent-file | — |
| The wild ledger | — | — |
| The kept view | 90% of the outline +60% outstanding · 1 ridgeline | — |
| The waiting water | — | — |
| The quiet lines | – | – |
| The drawn water | 12 reaches · 10% setback strips | – |
| The allowed shape | 0% under density overlays | – |
| The rebuild’s receipts | 122 frames filed · 2011–2014 | – |
| The pedal network | 0.0 km inside the outline | – |
| The remembered names | – | – |
| The rules on the ground | 8 drawn rules · Rapaki Runanga | – |
| On the hazard register | 1 parcel none current | – |
| Made ground on file | 5 parcels all vouched or natural | – |
| Surveyed rocks | 762 rocks 419 fell · 71 wobble easy | – |
| Cleanups on file | 1 parcel none verified | – |
| The model’s verdict | unlikely 2% of the outline | – |
| Engineered defences | – | – |
| The canopy | 17 trees no veterans · 16 remembered felled | – |
| The plan’s word | Rural Banks Peninsula 52% of the outline · 7% residential | – |
| The plan’s reservations | – | – |
| The plan’s exceptions | – | – |
| The listed city | – | – |
| The usual complaints | Water Leak 91 · Parks 60 · Graffiti 38 | Graffiti 29 · Water Leak 26 · Roading/Streets 16 |
| Schools | 0 | 0 |
| Parks | 5 | 0 |
| Facilities | 0 | 0 |
| Tracks | 0 | 0 |
| Bus stops | 2 | — |
| Bus routes through | 1 | — |
| Heritage places | 0 | 2 |
Same record, same caveats, the stream counts reports, not virtue. Cass Bay's page · Rapaki's page
Questions, answered briefly
the record holds 538 reports for Cass Bay and 165 for Rapaki.
Rapaki, 2 on the heritage register to the other’s 0.
The same public record for both, council reports, the crash register, the heritage schedule, Stats NZ’s counts. The stream counts reports, not virtue; the caveats are each suburb’s own.
Questions, answered briefly
Two suburbs' public records side by side: reports filed, crashes counted, schools, parks, bus stops, heritage places, population and density. Every number is the same dataset the suburb pages use.
Not necessarily. The record counts what people chose to report, population, awareness and reporting habits all move the number. Read it as the suburb’s report stream, not a complaint league table.
The same public sources as everywhere else on the site: council reports via Snap Send Solve, NZTA’s Crash Analysis System, the council’s parks and facilities layers, Metro’s stop data, the Heritage New Zealand register, and census figures via Wikipedia’s suburb summaries.