chch.live what was here

What stood on this ground?

The heritage register’s answer within 250m of -43.56235, 172.64274, 1 place on record, nearest first. Distances are to each place’s recorded pin, not its boundary.

The ground itself

This point falls inside Beckenham and in the Cashmere ward, Tim Scandrett's seat, on the Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote community board’s ground, measured against the drawn boundaries, so a point near an edge belongs to the side it is on, not the side its address is described as. The whole roll is at /wards.

The ground that moved

the February 2011 survey drew mapped liquefaction here. A patch is the survey’s footprint, not a finding about this address, the certainty tags and the whole city’s count are at /liquefaction.

The Crown’s line

The Crown’s 2011 classification left this point outside the residential red zone, whatever the surveys mapped, the line the government bought out did not cross it. The whole boundary is drawn at /redzone.

The plan’s word

The district plan files this ground as Residential Suburban (RS), the residential family. A zone is a permission, not a description, it says what the plan allows on this patch, not what stands on it. The whole district’s zoning is drawn at /zones.

The marae and the old grounds

The nearest marae on the roll is Te Puna Wānaka, wharenui Te Mātauranga Māori, 2.7km from this point (Ara Institute of Canterbury — the tertiary whare on the city campus). The nearest named ground the plan schedules is Puāri Pā, Victoria Square and north along the river, 3.7km away, the Waitaha settlement on the Ōtākaro bank — the oldest village the city centre covers, and later the market where Ngāi Tūāhuriri sold produce. The whole roll of marae and the grounds the plan names are kept at /maraes, a record of what the file says, not a claim on this point.

The ground’s grade

The 2011 grading filed this point TC2, technical category 2, yellow. Enhanced foundations, better piles or a stronger slab, were judged necessary here. A category is the verdict for a patch of ground, not a finding about this address, that belongs to an engineer. The grades, drawn: /technical-categories.

The ground itself

No recorded dump under this point, the council keeps the old tips on the books and this ground isn’t one of them. The ones that are, from 1880 on: /landfills.

When the water came

No recorded flood patch reaches this point, the council’s layer keeps the water it saw, and it never drew water here. The ground it did draw: /floods.

The named ground

Named water within 500 m of this point, measured to the line or the edge; the council’s own structure register, bridges, boardwalks and steps standing nearby, the open map’s record.

The rebuild’s receipts

The rebuild photographed this ground, 546 SCIRT frames within a few hundred metres, 2010–2016, wastewater work mostly. The nearest is about 77 m away, an access shot from 2011-08-07, the frame itself. A work log filed as the dig went on, not a survey of what stands today, the whole record is drawn at /rebuild.

The pedal network

The council’s cycleway layer files a shared path about 91 m from this point. Within a short walk the layer files 8.3 km of network. The whole network is drawn at /cycleways.

The remembered names

The plaque register puts a dedication about 133 m from this point, it reads “EDGAR TAYLOR WALK duplicate entry (full text in 35498)”, standing on Beckenham Park, commissioned 2008. 6 inscribed plaques stand within a short walk. The whole roll is kept at /plaques.

The rules on this ground

No alcohol here, this point sits inside a ban area (South Colombo, South Colombo, South Colombo), in force around the clock. 1 bottle-store buffer holds around this point, new liquor licences are fenced by distance. The ground sits inside the takiwā of Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga. The bylaw is the instrument, this is the register’s own drawing of it, thinned to about four metres; the legal wording wins where they differ. The whole rulebook: /rules.

The dangerous work

No hazardous-activities listing reaches this point, the register keeps the parcels where contaminating work ran, and this isn’t one of them. The ones that are: /hazards.

The made ground

No fill parcel reaches this point, the files keep the ground that was made, and this isn’t filed as made. The parcels that are: /fill.

What the model says

The 2019 liquefaction vulnerability study draws this ground as Medium Liquefaction Vulnerability, River flood basin and estuary plain deposits, observed performance variable and uncertainty in liquefaction performance due to effects of layered silty soil profiles. That is a district-scale screening read, not a finding about an address, the study itself says site-specific analysis confirms a parcel. What the ground actually did in February 2011 is the record above; the whole study is drawn at /vulnerability.

The armour

The register puts the nearest engineered defence 1.7km away, a rock anchor. Nearly all of these are the emergency works the quake years left standing, the file’s condition rating is its own word, not a fresh inspection. The whole register is drawn at /defences.

The canopy

The register counts 8 notable trees within half a kilometre of this point, 1 veteran, 7 carrying a protection, the nearest is Kahikatea (dacrydioides), 10 m tall, a crown 6 m across, carrying a subdivision protection, on private land, 209m away. A tree record is the register’s word on what stands, not a fresh survey. The whole canopy is drawn at /trees.

The shakes near here

The nearest break GeoNet recorded sits 486m from this point, a M3.1 on 23 February 2011, 8 km deep, labelled “Within 5 km of Christchurch”, its record at GeoNet. 16 magnitude-3+ epicentres sit within a kilometre, the biggest inside five kilometres a M6.2 on 22 February 2011, 5 km deep. An epicentre is where the instruments placed the break, not where the shaking was felt; the whole catalogue is counted at /sequence and the story in plain language is the earthquakes explainer.

The fault nearest here

The nearest mapped fault trace sits 21.6km from this point , part of the Greendale Fault. A drawn trace is the record of where the ground broke or deformed, not a prediction for this address, the mapped faults are at /faults.

The rocks overhead

The nearest surveyed boulder sits 831m from this point , still in place. A pin is where the survey saw the rock, not a promise about the slope, the whole survey is at /boulders.

What the record says

Former Beckenham Library and Setting 193m from your point

44 unread leads · Beckenham, its whole record →

On the register nearby

How this answer is made

The register this asks is the district-plan heritage schedule and the Heritage New Zealand list, scheduled places, not everything that stood here. Each place’s pin carries its own precision, the nearest is recorded to ±11m. The radius is yours to widen, ask again at 1000m. A register listing is a lead to follow, not by itself a claim, and if the record has this ground wrong, the corrections door is open.

See it on the map → · Every place on the register → · Search near here →