What stood on this ground?
The heritage register’s answer within 250m of -43.52123, 172.64193, nothing scheduled in the register here. Distances are to each place’s recorded pin, not its boundary.
The ground itself
This point falls inside Christchurch Central and in the Central ward, Jake McLellan's seat, on the Papanui-Innes-Central community board’s ground, measured against the drawn boundaries, so a point near an edge belongs to the side it is on, not the side its address is described as. The whole roll is at /wards.
The ground that moved
the February 2011 survey drew mapped liquefaction here. A patch is the survey’s footprint, not a finding about this address, the certainty tags and the whole city’s count are at /liquefaction.
The Crown’s line
The Crown’s 2011 classification left this point outside the residential red zone, whatever the surveys mapped, the line the government bought out did not cross it. The whole boundary is drawn at /redzone.
The plan’s word
The district plan files this ground as High density residential zone (HRZ), the residential family. A zone is a permission, not a description, it says what the plan allows on this patch, not what stands on it. The whole district’s zoning is drawn at /zones.
The marae and the old grounds
The nearest marae on the roll is Rehua Marae, wharenui Te Whatu Manawa Māoritanga o Rehua, 985m from this point (the city's urban Māori community — under the korowai of mana whenua Ngāi Tūāhuriri). The nearest named ground the plan schedules is Ōtautahi — Tautahi's kāinga, the Avon Loop, near Oxford Terrace and Barbadoes Street, 417m away, the seasonal camp of the chief the city is named for — Tautahi, son of Huikai of Koukourārata — on the Avon Loop. The whole roll of marae and the grounds the plan names are kept at /maraes, a record of what the file says, not a claim on this point.
The ground’s grade
The 2011 grading filed this point TC3, technical category 3, blue. Site-specific engineering was judged necessary here, the ground itself gets its own verdict. A category is the verdict for a patch of ground, not a finding about this address, that belongs to an engineer. The grades, drawn: /technical-categories.
The ground itself
No recorded dump under this point, the council keeps the old tips on the books and this ground isn’t one of them. The ones that are, from 1880 on: /landfills.
When the water came
No recorded flood patch reaches this point, the council’s layer keeps the water it saw, and it never drew water here. The ground it did draw: /floods.
The waiting water
No high-hazard flood area covers this point It sits inside the Avon River flood-management area , the catchment’s own watch. The whole flood map is drawn at /flood-hazard.
The quiet lines
No air-noise contour covers this point The ground is zoned Category 3, Lower Noise Level Area , the central city’s graded night. The whole map is drawn at /noise.
The named ground
Named water within 500 m of this point, measured to the line or the edge; Named places within 1.5 km of this point; the council’s own structure register, bridges, boardwalks and steps standing nearby, the open map’s record.
The allowed shape
The plan’s density map holds this point, inside the Residential Central City Overlay. The central-city walking catchment reaches this far, the ten-minute city the plan draws. The shape’s map is drawn at /density.
The rebuild’s receipts
The rebuild photographed this ground, 1159 SCIRT frames within a few hundred metres, 2009–2016, stormwater work mostly. The nearest is about 27 m away, an inlet shot from 2013-01-21, the frame itself. A work log filed as the dig went on, not a survey of what stands today, the whole record is drawn at /rebuild.
The pedal network
The council’s cycleway layer files a cycle lane about 81 m from this point. Within a short walk the layer files 10.5 km of network. The whole network is drawn at /cycleways.
The rules on this ground
No alcohol here, this point sits inside a ban area (Central City, Central City), in force around the clock. The dog rules name this ground, Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed). Freedom camping is managed here, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area. The ground sits inside the takiwā of Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga. The bylaw is the instrument, this is the register’s own drawing of it, thinned to about four metres; the legal wording wins where they differ. The whole rulebook: /rules.
The dangerous work
No hazardous-activities listing reaches this point, the register keeps the parcels where contaminating work ran, and this isn’t one of them. The ones that are: /hazards.
The made ground
No fill parcel reaches this point, the files keep the ground that was made, and this isn’t filed as made. The parcels that are: /fill.
What the model says
The 2019 liquefaction vulnerability study draws this ground as Medium Liquefaction Vulnerability, River plain and channel deposits, observed performance variable and uncertainty in liquefaction performance due to effects of layered silty soil profiles. That is a district-scale screening read, not a finding about an address, the study itself says site-specific analysis confirms a parcel. What the ground actually did in February 2011 is the record above; the whole study is drawn at /vulnerability.
The armour
The register puts the nearest engineered defence 5.4km away, a rock cable installed 2011. Nearly all of these are the emergency works the quake years left standing, the file’s condition rating is its own word, not a fresh inspection. The whole register is drawn at /defences.
The canopy
The register counts 121 notable trees within half a kilometre of this point, 43 veterans, 82 carrying a protection, the nearest is Caucasian Ash (oxycarpa), 9 m tall, a crown 11 m across, carrying a resource consent protection, on private land, 32m away. A tree record is the register’s word on what stands, not a fresh survey. The whole canopy is drawn at /trees.
The shakes near here
The nearest break GeoNet recorded sits 863m from this point, a M3.8 on 25 September 2010, 5 km deep, labelled “Within 5 km of Christchurch”, its record at GeoNet. 1 magnitude-3+ epicentre sits within a kilometre, the biggest inside five kilometres a M4.7 on 26 December 2010, 5 km deep. An epicentre is where the instruments placed the break, not where the shaking was felt; the whole catalogue is counted at /sequence and the story in plain language is the earthquakes explainer.
The fault nearest here
The nearest mapped fault trace sits 22.3km from this point , part of the Greendale Fault. A drawn trace is the record of where the ground broke or deformed, not a prediction for this address, the mapped faults are at /faults.
The rocks overhead
The nearest surveyed boulder sits 4.6km from this point , it came down in the shakes. A pin is where the survey saw the rock, not a promise about the slope, the whole survey is at /boulders.
No scheduled place sits within 250m of this point. Widened to 2 km, the nearest on record is Former Dwelling and Setting, Holly Lea/McLean's Mansion , 297m away, 387 Manchester Street. That is a statement about the register, not the ground, unscheduled does not mean unstoried, only that no listing has been made for it.
How this answer is made
The register this asks is the district-plan heritage schedule and the Heritage New Zealand list, scheduled places, not everything that stood here. The radius is yours to widen, ask again at 1000m. A register listing is a lead to follow, not by itself a claim, and if the record has this ground wrong, the corrections door is open.
See it on the map → · Every place on the register → · Search near here →