What stood on this ground?
The heritage register’s answer within 250m of -43.52319, 172.64901, 3 places on record, nearest first. Distances are to each place’s recorded pin, not its boundary.
The ground itself
This point falls inside Christchurch Central and in the Central ward, Jake McLellan's seat, on the Papanui-Innes-Central community board’s ground, measured against the drawn boundaries, so a point near an edge belongs to the side it is on, not the side its address is described as. The whole roll is at /wards.
The ground that moved
the September 2010 survey drew mapped liquefaction here. A patch is the survey’s footprint, not a finding about this address, the certainty tags and the whole city’s count are at /liquefaction.
The Crown’s line
The Crown’s 2011 classification left this point outside the residential red zone, whatever the surveys mapped, the line the government bought out did not cross it. The whole boundary is drawn at /redzone.
The plan’s word
The district plan files this ground as Specific Purpose (Otakaro Avon River Corridor) (SPOA), the specific purpose family. A zone is a permission, not a description, it says what the plan allows on this patch, not what stands on it. The whole district’s zoning is drawn at /zones.
The plan’s exceptions
2 qualifying matters touch this ground: Heritage Item, Heritage Setting. A matter narrows how the density rule applies here, it does not forbid, and the zone underneath still speaks. The whole register is at /matters.
The listed city
The plan’s heritage schedule protects this ground, the setting of Bangor Street No. 3 Pumphouse and Setting, graded highly significant. The setting travels with the item, altering or demolishing here is a consent question the unlisted neighbour doesn’t face.
The whole schedule is at /heritage.
The marae and the old grounds
The nearest marae on the roll is Rehua Marae, wharenui Te Whatu Manawa Māoritanga o Rehua, 1.6km from this point (the city's urban Māori community, under the korowai of mana whenua Ngāi Tūāhuriri). The nearest named ground the plan schedules is Ōtautahi, Tautahi's kāinga, the Avon Loop, near Oxford Terrace and Barbadoes Street, 600m away, the seasonal camp of Tautahi, the chief the city is named for and son of Huikai of Koukourārata, on the Avon Loop. The whole roll of marae and the grounds the plan names are kept at /maraes, a record of what the file says, not a claim on this point.
The kept view
This ground sits inside the plan’s landscape schedules, significant ground in the plan’s grading, SF8.2 - Significant Feature. What happens here answers to the view, the skyline, the cliffs, the shape of the place. The whole map of kept views is at /landscape.
The ground’s grade
The 2011 grading never reached this point, the categories ran over the flat residential land, and this ground sits outside them. A category is the verdict for a patch of ground, not a finding about this address, that belongs to an engineer. The grades, drawn: /technical-categories.
The ground itself
No recorded dump under this point, the council keeps the old tips on the books and this ground isn’t one of them. The ones that are, from 1880 on: /landfills.
When the water came
The record drew water over this point once – 2011-2014 Flooding - Mayoral Flood Taskforce. Each patch is one event’s observation, not a live hazard finding, the whole record is drawn at /floods.
The waiting water
The plan’s flood map puts this point inside a high flood hazard area, the ground it expects to take water deep or fast. It sits inside the Avon River flood-management area , the catchment’s own watch. The whole flood map is drawn at /flood-hazard.
The quiet lines
No air-noise contour covers this point The ground is zoned Category 3, Lower Noise Level Area , the central city’s graded night. The whole map is drawn at /noise.
The named ground
Named water within 500 m of this point, measured to the line or the edge; the council’s own structure register, bridges, boardwalks and steps standing nearby, the open map’s record.
The drawn water
The plan’s water-margin layers hold this point, inside a 30-metre setback strip along a Downstream Waterway (except Mona Vale). The margin’s map is drawn at /water-margin.
The allowed shape
The central-city walking catchment reaches this far, the ten-minute city the plan draws. The shape’s map is drawn at /density.
The rebuild’s receipts
The rebuild photographed this ground, 941 SCIRT frames within a few hundred metres, 2007–2017, stormwater work mostly. The nearest is about 6 m away, an access shot from 2007-02-03, the frame itself. A work log filed as the dig went on, not a survey of what stands today, the whole record is drawn at /rebuild.
The pedal network
The council’s cycleway layer files a shared path about 6 m from this point, it belongs to City to Sea Pathway, one of the named Major Cycle Routes. Within a short walk the layer files 3.6 km of network. The whole network is drawn at /cycleways.
The remembered names
The plaque register puts a dedication about 381 m from this point, it reads “THIS CAIRN / MARKS THE SITE / OF THE / BRICK WHARF / WHERE THE / EARLY SETTLER / LANDED 1840 / ERECTED DEC 1926”, standing on Avon Riverbank Central City. 2 inscribed plaques stand within a short walk, across 2 named grounds. The whole roll is kept at /plaques.
The rules on this ground
No alcohol here, this point sits inside a ban area (Central City, Central City), in force around the clock. The dog rules name this ground, Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed). Freedom camping is managed here, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area. The ground sits inside the takiwā of Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga. The bylaw is the instrument, this is the register’s own drawing of it, thinned to about four metres; the legal wording wins where they differ. The whole rulebook: /rules.
The dangerous work
No hazardous-activities listing reaches this point, the register keeps the parcels where contaminating work ran, and this isn’t one of them. The ones that are: /hazards.
The made ground
No fill parcel reaches this point, the files keep the ground that was made, and this isn’t filed as made. The parcels that are: /fill.
What the model says
The 2019 liquefaction vulnerability study draws this ground as High Liquefaction Vulnerability, River plain and channel deposits, observed performance variable and uncertainty in liquefaction performance due to effects of layered silty soil profiles, and the notes flag it for possible lateral spreading near a free face. That is a district-scale screening read, not a finding about an address, the study itself says site-specific analysis confirms a parcel. What the ground actually did in February 2011 is the record above; the whole study is drawn at /vulnerability.
The armour
The register puts the nearest engineered defence 5.0km away, a rock cable installed 2011. Nearly all of these are the emergency works the quake years left standing, the file’s condition rating is its own word, not a fresh inspection. The whole register is drawn at /defences.
The canopy
The register counts 79 notable trees within half a kilometre of this point, 56 veterans, 27 carrying a protection, the nearest is Babylon Weeping Willow (babylonica), 15 m tall, 1.2 m through, a crown 15 m across, a veteran, 18m away. A tree record is the register’s word on what stands, not a fresh survey. The whole canopy is drawn at /trees.
The shakes near here
The nearest break GeoNet recorded sits 805m from this point, a M3.8 on 25 September 2010, 5 km deep, labelled “Within 5 km of Christchurch”, its record at GeoNet. 1 magnitude-3+ epicentre sits within a kilometre, the biggest inside five kilometres a M4.7 on 26 December 2010, 5 km deep. An epicentre is where the instruments placed the break, not where the shaking was felt; the whole catalogue is counted at /sequence and the story in plain language is the earthquakes explainer.
The fault nearest here
The nearest mapped fault trace sits 22.8km from this point , part of the Greendale Fault. A drawn trace is the record of where the ground broke or deformed, not a prediction for this address, the mapped faults are at /faults.
The rocks overhead
The nearest surveyed boulder sits 4.3km from this point , it came down in the shakes. A pin is where the survey saw the rock, not a promise about the slope, the whole survey is at /boulders.
What the record says
“Barbadoes Street Cemetery's burial record runs in three Church of England registers: No. 1 from 9 April 1851 to 29 January 1870, No. 2 from 2 February 1870 to 3 September 1882, and No. 3 from 4 September 1882 into the 1970s.” · Barbadoes Street Cemetery : alphabetical list of burials
5 sourced claims · a written piece · 20 unread leads, its whole record →
20 unread leads · Central City, its whole record →
On the register nearby
- Bangor Street No. 3 Pumphouse and Setting, 3m
- Dwelling and Setting, 78m · 361 Cambridge Terrace
- Barbadoes Street Cemetery and Setting, 180m · 5 sourced claims
How this answer is made
The register this asks is the district-plan heritage schedule and the Heritage New Zealand list, scheduled places, not everything that stood here. Each place’s pin carries its own precision, the nearest is recorded to ±4m. The radius is yours to widen, ask again at 1000m. A register listing is a lead to follow, not by itself a claim, and if the record has this ground wrong, the corrections door is open.
See it on the map → · Every place on the register → · Search near here →