What stood on this ground?
The heritage register’s answer within 250m of -43.52327, 172.63243, 5 places on record, nearest first. Distances are to each place’s recorded pin, not its boundary.
The ground itself
This point falls inside Christchurch Central and in the Central ward, Jake McLellan's seat, on the Papanui-Innes-Central community board’s ground, measured against the drawn boundaries, so a point near an edge belongs to the side it is on, not the side its address is described as. The whole roll is at /wards.
The ground that moved
Neither post-quake survey drew a mapped patch over this point, no liquefaction, no flooding on the record here. The record’s edges and the city’s count are at /liquefaction.
The Crown’s line
The Crown’s 2011 classification left this point outside the residential red zone, whatever the surveys mapped, the line the government bought out did not cross it. The whole boundary is drawn at /redzone.
The plan’s word
The district plan files this ground as Transport (T), the transport family. A zone is a permission, not a description, it says what the plan allows on this patch, not what stands on it. The whole district’s zoning is drawn at /zones.
The marae and the old grounds
The nearest marae on the roll is Rehua Marae, wharenui Te Whatu Manawa Māoritanga o Rehua, 700m from this point (the city's urban Māori community, under the korowai of mana whenua Ngāi Tūāhuriri). The nearest named ground the plan schedules is Puāri Pā, Victoria Square and north along the river, 776m away, the Waitaha settlement on the Ōtākaro bank, the oldest village the city centre covers, and later the market where Ngāi Tūāhuriri sold produce. The whole roll of marae and the grounds the plan names are kept at /maraes, a record of what the file says, not a claim on this point.
The ground’s grade
The 2011 grading never reached this point, the categories ran over the flat residential land, and this ground sits outside them. A category is the verdict for a patch of ground, not a finding about this address, that belongs to an engineer. The grades, drawn: /technical-categories.
The ground itself
No recorded dump under this point, the council keeps the old tips on the books and this ground isn’t one of them. The ones that are, from 1880 on: /landfills.
When the water came
No recorded flood patch reaches this point, the council’s layer keeps the water it saw, and it never drew water here. The ground it did draw: /floods.
The quiet lines
No air-noise contour covers this point The ground is zoned Category 3, Lower Noise Level Area , the central city’s graded night. The whole map is drawn at /noise.
The named ground
Named water within 500 m of this point, measured to the line or the edge; Named places within 1.5 km of this point; the council’s own structure register, bridges, boardwalks and steps standing nearby, the open map’s record.
The allowed shape
The central-city walking catchment reaches this far, the ten-minute city the plan draws. The shape’s map is drawn at /density.
The rebuild’s receipts
The rebuild photographed this ground, 910 SCIRT frames within a few hundred metres, 2011–2015, stormwater work mostly. The nearest is about 27 m away, an access shot from 2011-12-15, the frame itself. A work log filed as the dig went on, not a survey of what stands today, the whole record is drawn at /rebuild.
The pedal network
The council’s cycleway layer files a cycle lane about 185 m from this point. Within a short walk the layer files 2.7 km of network. The whole network is drawn at /cycleways.
The remembered names
The plaque register puts a dedication about 122 m from this point, it reads “ALDRED PARK / IN 1993 A SUGGESTION WAS PUT TO THE CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL BY THE VICTORIA NEIGHBOURHOOD GROUP, TO ESTABLISH A RESERVE ON THIS SITE. / SUBSEQUENTLY IT WAS PURCHASED, CLEARED AND LANDSCAPED. / IT HAS BEEN NAMED FOR THE REVEREND ALDRED WHO OWNED LARGE TRACTS OF THE LAND IN THIS AREA DURING THE CITY'S EARLY SETTLEMENT. / THE NEIGHBOURHOOD SURROUNDING THIS PARK IS ONE OF THE OLDEST IN THE CITY. THE SOCIAL CLASS STRUCTURE OF 100 YEARS AGO IS STILL EVIDENT IN THE STYLES OF HOUSING IN THE AREA, FROM THE SMALLEST OF WORKERS COTTAGES TO LARGE VILLAS AND GRANDER HOMES. / EXAMPLES OF SOME OF THESE CAN BE SEEN ON [illegible], DURHAM, PEACOCK AND MONTREAL STREETS, ALSO [illegible] AND GRACEFIELD AVENUES. / NOTABLE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED HERE INCLUDE JAMES K BAXTER (WRITER & POET) AND FANNY BUSS (ARTIST). / IN MEMORY OF / GEORGE THORN, JOHN HUGGINS, FRANK WARE & FRASER BURRIDGE, / WHO HELPED MAKE THIS A NEIGHBOURHOOD.”, standing on Aldred Reserve, commissioned 2004. 8 inscribed plaques stand within a short walk, across 3 named grounds. The whole roll is kept at /plaques.
The rules on this ground
No alcohol here, this point sits inside a ban area (Central City, Central City), in force around the clock. The dog rules name this ground, Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed); Central City (leashed). Freedom camping is managed here, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area, Christchurch Urban Restricted Area. The ground sits inside the takiwā of Te Ngai Tuahuriri Runanga. The bylaw is the instrument, this is the register’s own drawing of it, thinned to about four metres; the legal wording wins where they differ. The whole rulebook: /rules.
The dangerous work
No hazardous-activities listing reaches this point, the register keeps the parcels where contaminating work ran, and this isn’t one of them. The ones that are: /hazards.
The made ground
No fill parcel reaches this point, the files keep the ground that was made, and this isn’t filed as made. The parcels that are: /fill.
What the model says
The 2019 liquefaction vulnerability study draws this ground as Medium Liquefaction Vulnerability, River plain and channel deposits, observed performance variable and uncertainty in liquefaction performance due to effects of layered silty soil profiles. That is a district-scale screening read, not a finding about an address, the study itself says site-specific analysis confirms a parcel. What the ground actually did in February 2011 is the record above; the whole study is drawn at /vulnerability.
The armour
The register puts the nearest engineered defence 5.7km away, a rock cable installed 2011. Nearly all of these are the emergency works the quake years left standing, the file’s condition rating is its own word, not a fresh inspection. The whole register is drawn at /defences.
The canopy
The register counts 121 notable trees within half a kilometre of this point, 10 veterans, 111 carrying a protection, the nearest is Ash (excelsior), 3 m tall, carrying a resource consent protection, on private land, 86m away. A tree record is the register’s word on what stands, not a fresh survey. The whole canopy is drawn at /trees.
The shakes near here
The nearest break GeoNet recorded sits 1.1km from this point, a M3.8 on 25 September 2010, 5 km deep, labelled “Within 5 km of Christchurch”, its record at GeoNet. none within a kilometre, 87 within five, the biggest inside five kilometres a M4.7 on 26 December 2010, 5 km deep. An epicentre is where the instruments placed the break, not where the shaking was felt; the whole catalogue is counted at /sequence and the story in plain language is the earthquakes explainer.
The fault nearest here
The nearest mapped fault trace sits 21.5km from this point , part of the Greendale Fault. A drawn trace is the record of where the ground broke or deformed, not a prediction for this address, the mapped faults are at /faults.
The rocks overhead
The nearest surveyed boulder sits 4.6km from this point , it came down in the shakes. A pin is where the survey saw the rock, not a promise about the slope, the whole survey is at /boulders.
What the record says
20 unread leads · Central City, its whole record →
20 unread leads · Central City, its whole record →
On the register nearby
- Dwelling and Setting, 86m · 18 Beveridge Street
- Dwelling and Setting, 138m · 402 Montreal Street
- Dwelling and Setting, 142m · 404 Montreal Street
- Dwelling and Setting, 145m · 406 Montreal Street
- Dwelling and Setting, 147m · 2/408 Montreal Street
How this answer is made
The register this asks is the district-plan heritage schedule and the Heritage New Zealand list, scheduled places, not everything that stood here. Each place’s pin carries its own precision, the nearest is recorded to ±8m. The radius is yours to widen, ask again at 1000m. A register listing is a lead to follow, not by itself a claim, and if the record has this ground wrong, the corrections door is open.
See it on the map → · Every place on the register → · Search near here →